You mean like waste thousands of
crops on Ethanol while people starve in developing countries?
Not exact matches
The U.S. is drunk
on ethanol — but whether it is made from corn or sugarcane, the
crop - derived biofuel raises a host of questions
There is certainly a case for re-doubling the scientific efforts to produce bio-fuels
on lands which do not compete with food
crops, for example from cellulosic
ethanol, but this technology is still not ready for the market.
Chemists at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory are closing in
on cheap ways to make cellulosic
ethanol, a form of
ethanol derived from agricultural waste rather than food
crops like soybeans or corn.
Previous studies
on switchgrass plots suggested that
ethanol made from the plant would yield anywhere from 343 % to 700 % of the energy put into growing the
crop and processing it into biofuel.
But one industry group —
ethanol producers — is noting Pruitt's past differences with Trump
on another hot - button EPA issue: the law that mandates the use of the
crop - based gasoline additive.
On the other hand it uses and existing source instead of burning 1 / 6th of our feed
crop for the
ethanol boondoggle.
Today, the House Energy and Commerce Committee should be holding a hearing
on advancing America's, and the world's, energy future by initiating a sustained quest to break the economic shackles imposed by enduring dependence
on oil (that doesn't involve using 40 percent of our corn
crop to produce
ethanol in a world facing food price spikes).
For
ethanol there is in deed a big question here, but the DOE study
on biodiesel claims that you get 3.5 units of biodiesel energy out for each unit of fossil fuel energy you put in; with better technology and
crops, it can ge better.
I saw your support for cellulosic
ethanol, but no statement
on the logic (or lack thereof) of the United States diverting some 40 percent of its corn
crop to fuel while world grain prices soar.
The only issue I see with
ethanol is that it depends somewhat
on crop growth, and fossil fuels are used heavily to make modern fertilizer.
Others have further elaborated
on the carbon implications of various forms of bioenergy, from corn
ethanol to
crop residue cellulosic fuels to wood bioenergy.
Plans
on the Hill right now for a five-fold increase in
ethanol imply, well, going to 100 % of the
crop.]
We also have a sorghum
crop, increasing dramatically,
on less desirable land conditions (not suited to corn) that supplied 10 - 15 % of last years
ethanol feedstock.
«Excessive prices for oil and food» to a certain extent the result of policy restrictions
on the use of hydrocarbons, the effect of extrusion from the structure of arable food
crops through improved
crop plants from which
ethanol is produced to replace hydrocarbons as fuel.
Practically speaking, one would probably use for
ethanol production only a little over half of the soil bank lands and add to this some portion of the plants now grown as animal feed
crops (for example,
on the 70 million acres that now grow soybeans for animal feed).
They say the technological fixes also distract from more challenging social reforms like slowing the rate of population growth, shifting away from
crops like corn
ethanol that don't put food
on the table, or ending subsidies for livestock production, which currently eats up an appalling 75 percent of the world's agricultural land.
Clinton also criticized the heavy U.S. reliance
on a food
crop, corn, to produce
ethanol for fuel, which helped drive up grain prices worldwide.
In 2007 and early 2008, for example, a bumper
crop of media articles blamed sharply higher food prices worldwide
on the production of biofuels, particularly
ethanol from corn, in the United States.