We've learned to grow more
crops on less land.
Not exact matches
That's why the Rainforest Alliance works with farmers to advance a variety of strategies, such as
crop intensification (growing more food
on less land), and with traditional forest - dwellers to develop livelihoods that don't hurt forests or ecosystems.
Study author Catherine Bowyer says the next generation of biofuels, made from wastes or wood rather than
crops, would have
less impact
on land use than biofuels made from
crops, but «the policy is also not effectively stimulating advancements in biofuel technologies».
Genetically modified
crops could help us grow more food
on less land in a world struggling to cope with climate change, say biologists.
They need to grow quickly and have to be successful
on marginal
land that's
less suited to growing food
crops.
However, with me at least, a bit part of the deal is the increased acidity reducing fish harvests, water shortages, droughts severely reducing
crops (sure — more rain, but more over the ocean,
less on land — and with greater evaporation before the water trickles to a dry stream bed), increased heat reducing rice production and other heat sensative
crops, the heat waves, etc..
We also have a sorghum
crop, increasing dramatically,
on less desirable
land conditions (not suited to corn) that supplied 10 - 15 % of last years ethanol feedstock.
He sees genetic engineering as a tool for environmental protection:
crops designed to grow
on less land with
less pesticide; new microbes that protect ecosystems against invasive species, produce new fuels and maybe sequester carbon.
It's also, apparently, a genetically - interesting
crop, and scientists have unlocked the secret to its super efficient form of photosynthesis that uses considerably
less water and allows it to grow
on less - than - hospitable
land.