Is the notion of
the cross as judgment simply mythology?
Not exact matches
We weren't demythologizing the Bible or playing down the blood or the
cross of Jesus or the
judgment of God (
as Mark's logic would suggest these are interrelated with the ordination of women
as pastors).
... While the Principle of Redemptive Withdrawal is focused on the abandonment Jesus experienced
as he experienced the Father's
judgment on the sin of the world, it is nevertheless grounded in the truth that the
cross is the definitive expression of the self - giving, mutual indwelling agape - love that defines the triune God throughout eternity (p. 778).
For without a sense of sin, we end up with the situation described so well by H. Richard Niebuhr
as early
as 1937: «A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without
judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a
cross.»
Announcing to them their
judgment is imminent,
as he had just come from the victory on the
cross.
Although in Pinnock, the Supreme Court gave the lie to exceptionality
as the criterion (exceptionality is the outcome, not the criterion), the
judgments in Pinnock and Powell are nevertheless littered with references to it being the exceptional case which will
cross the proportionality threshold.