Not exact matches
God wants humanity to understand that nothing and nobody is beyond the scope of His redemptive purposes, and so by sending Jesus as the fulfillment of the most
violent of religious texts, God not only revealed Himself by way of a stark contrast to that violence, but also showed how to reinterpret and understand those
violent events
in light of the self - sacrificial God dying on the
cross for the sins of the whole
world.
When God looks
violent in the Old Testament, it is not because He is
violent, but because He is taking the sins of the
world upon Himself, just as Jesus did on the
cross.
When I read you say this as your possible resolution: «When God looks
violent in the Old Testament, it is not because He is
violent, but because He is taking the sins of the
world upon Himself, just as Jesus did on the
cross.»
I know that the burden of proof lies upon me to show how my thesis fits with Scripture, but I am beginning to think that the real burden of proof lies upon those who want to maintain that God is
violent despite all the evidence to the contrary
in the life, ministry, and teachings of Jesus Christ, and especially
in what He did for the entire
world on the
cross.
My book was called When God Pled Guilty, and I was basically arguing that just as Jesus took the sins of the
world upon Himself on the
cross, so also, somehow, the
violent portrayals of God
in the Old Testament is God taking the sins of Israel upon Himself through the testimony of inspired Scripture.
At times God appears
violent, not because He is
violent, but because, just as Jesus on the
cross took the sin of the
world upon Himself, so also God
in human history, took the violence of humanity upon Himself.