Sentences with phrase «cross up to his shoulder»

When Christ tells me to take up my cross, I must picture Him lifting a cross up to His shoulder.

Not exact matches

Mozart was divinely destined to die young, an impossible prodigy appearing and vanishing like a flash of lightning crossing the heavens, while it was ordained from everlasting that Haydn should enjoy a serene longevity in which to unfold his genius; Keats grown old would have been a drastic error of taste on the part of providence, while it was absolutely necessary that Wordsworth begin as a «lyrical» radical but end up a withered Tory sage penning sonorous banalities.

We should do whatever we can to alleviate the sufferings of others, but Jesus also invites us to «take up our cross» each day and follow him by making our lives a sacrifice of love to God's glory and in the service of others.For more information see our video on Suffering.

We should do whatever we can to alleviate the sufferings of others, but Jesus also invites us to «take up our cross» each day and follow him by making our lives a sacrifice of love to God's glory and in the service of others.

Countries and societies especially the US are carried away with everything under the umbrella of freedom and rights your governments should learn from third world countries true values and laws.certain lines should never be crossed and such movements need to be exterminated for the sake of youngsters that must learn true values and acts in order to be a well being and not end up in jail and on the long run in hell.

When you read in the Bible about proclaiming Jesus as Lord, following Jesus, taking up your cross, eternal reward, inheriting the Kingdom, life in the Spirit, faithful living, and on and on and on, the author who wrote that text was primarily thinking of how we should live as followers of Jesus so that we can experience the life God meant for us to live.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Even if we were strongly inclined to understand «take up his cross» to refer to shouldering some personal deprivation or disability, the text of Matthew would not allow it.

The point is, they are saying, since the cross symbol can also be a religious symbol, then it shouldn't be allowed to be put up because THEY DON «T BELIEVE IN THAT... but the museum isn't setting up any alter or prayer center, it's a symbol to memorialize a national tragedy.

One - term in office isn't nearly enough time to alleviate the debt crisis going on, and if I had to choose the lesser of two evils, I'd rather have the guy who has his head on his shoulders, and not the guy with a cross up his backside.

That's all well and good, but if having a cross up on a wall does no harm to the others around... surely the other symbols should be just as innocent.

i'm not taking anything away from Sanchez but our play is to have possession he should pass back if he has no one to cross, my opinion and my»n only is that he should hold his head up sometimes to see whats around him if he can do this i think he will go to the next level in football, before you disagree you should look at his past games for us.

Having said that we have a lot of players away on international duty and highly unlikely they will all come back fit we always pick up 1 or 2 injuries so we may have important players missing as well fingers cross for a change we have no injuries and everyone fit for liverpool game also we should have arteta, chamberlain and wilshire all fit to be in the squad!

Looking good... Jesus... Watch hazard or William destabilize defences and score from angles... that's looking good... Walcott put in a couple of decent crosses but rarely went past their defence and the couple of scoring chances he had were fluffed... Perez should walk in to starting line up...

If Arsenal stick to the slow build - up play, he should focus on attacking the posts for low crosses and latching onto through balls played in between defenders.

It would seem that Leno should have at least bumped him to give Sims time to cross the entire length of the oline to block a guy playing on the line of scrimmage and would surely be coming up field.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Lucas looked solid and supplied two very classy crosses that ended up as assists, but we can not expect him to become the club's main frontman overnight with Walcott and Sanchez in such brilliant form, but he should certainly be giving Arsene Wenger more options in his selection choices, especially as he looked to be a great winger this evening.

It was Giroud however who had the last laugh, with the Frenchman rising up high from Chambo's cross to make it 1 - 1 and the striker should be praised for the attitude he showed in the match.

Wenger lost the plot when he brought in Giroud... what about the beautiful game involves having a lumbering striker who's main attribute is holding up play... our success with Wenger, and even before, came with pace and clinical striking up front, having a boss in the midfield and having physically imposing CBs... what about Wright, Bergkamp, Anelka, Henry or RVP remind anyone of Giroud (minus the left foot of course)... the formula was broken, which didn't have to be the end of our success, but when you adopt half - measures you can't expect things just to work themselves out on their own... at the very least Wenger should have brought in some wingers that can consistently cross the ball and then spend significantly more time addressing our lack of success with set pieces... ultimately this is why we continued to struggle with consistency and continued to constantly play people in the wrong positions

That must had been a goal for us what a miss by wilshere should have crossed left to sanchez to tap in but we are playing excellent up till now keep carry on guys but don't miss these chances please

Elneny and Xhaka in front of the back four should give them some protection but having Bendtner againster will be a good test also, he may be the best striker in the world but he can still put himself about and get up well for crosses, that said we should still be to strong for Forest to overcome us.

Injuries (fingers crossed) should improve next season shad Forsyth said it would take up to a year to improve things and they really do seem to have improved in the second half of the season less injuries and players returning quicker once injured.

Holding's done well but his recent performances have shown that a youngster is indeed a youngster.Even when he was playing well there were many times where he overdid things.However, I'm saying all these things because the guy is being heavily replied upon and that's putting pressure on him hence the inconsistencies.I'm still sratching my head over the Gabriel sale.I honestly think he's better than Mertesacker, Holding and Chambers for now.The three back suited him perfectly.I agree with you that Ox can't score or defend but he can definitely set up chances with his crossing.In fact I think though he gets many wrong he's actually our best crosser.People should should go and rewatch his crosses and compare it to our other players.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

A month (fingers crossed) that should bring us a full slate of Sundays leading up to Labor Day Weekend.

Our pattern is only to cross the ball for him and he should work in his department holding up play..

Everyone connected with Arsenal should be crossing their fingers, toes and anything else that is cross-able this week and hoping that Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain reacts well to the injection he has had to try to ease the groin problem that the Gunner picked up near the end of Saturday's excellent win over Newcastle United.

Should not have let Walcott cross so easily to set up Campbell's first.

They didn't care for his many runs down the wings to sling in another cross; the ball he sent through to Jesse Lingard that saw the winger catch City's defenders out in order to feed Zlatan Ibrahimovic for another shot; his attempts to get by his markers and through the visitors» lines that resulted in a contentious challenge in the box from Claudio Bravo; and the deliveries into the area from set - pieces, two of which should've been turned in, one of which was too awkward for the visiting goalkeeper and John Stones, who spilled it after a mix - up for Ibrahimovic to score.

Salah's ability to draw double teams in the final third should open up acres of spaces for Digne to exploit, where he is then free to pump crosses into Dzeko virtually unfettered.

Most of our opportunities in the first game came through these two and the Tottenham tactics should be to utilise them high up the park looking to cross for Emmanuel Adebayor.

While it's important to allow creative cross play, you should encourage your children to clean up each station before moving to another.

We also demonstrated to the Commission that the current regulations fail to stop cross promotion of infant formula brands through other products, so the language in the Delegated Acts was toughened up to make it even clearer that infant formula branding and package text, images and colours should be clearly distinct from those used on follow - on formula.

Wrap the ends around to the back, and cross them, bringing them up over the shoulders back to the front.

When you do switch to a booster seat, make sure that it lifts your children up high enough and has belt guides that ensure the seatbelts cross over your child's body at the shoulders and hips.

Furthermore, it's not unknown for her to cross the line of tact and taste and even truth, as her «posh boy» remarks about David Cameron and George Osborne indicated (though it should be remembered that he didn't come up with the phrase, which was put to her by Giles Dilnot of the Daily and Sunday Politics - and which she then repeated).

He also announced the setting up of what he hoped would be a cross party group to decide if a British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities was needed, which he said should reach a conclusion by 2015 - the 800th anniversary of the signing of the Magna Carta.

Jump straight up explosively and as your feet leave the floor, cross your right leg in front of your left, then uncross so you land with feet shoulder - width apart to complete one rep (b).

Technique: Bend over, keeping feet a shoulders width apart and knees slightly bent for balance, hold cables, arms crossed, palms up, pull cables out to about shoulder height, pause - contracting rear deltoids.

Technique: Hold yourself up on bars, arms fully extended, bend knees and cross your legs at the ankle, lower your body by bending shoulders and elbows down as far as you can, pause, then press back up to arms» length.

In the first method, you step under the bar and cross your forearms into an «X» position while resting the bar on the dimple that is created by the shoulder muscle near the bone, keeping your elbows up high so that your arms are parallel to the ground.

Simply rotate your hands so that they are facing forward (the same direction as your face) and bring them up to about shoulder height so that your arms are in a cross position.

Strong lats and shoulders are also necessary, so you need to be able to do perfect, chin above bar, strict pull ups (do not kip, cross your legs, or swing.

Ideally, to avoid this you should go with a pair of lace - ups or straps that criss cross across your feet before making their way up.

This sweater featuring wide stripe and criss - cross lace - up on the shoulder, simple and casual design, easy to match, can wear inside or outside

Chiffon bikini cover - up with a criss - cross design, featuring smocked elastic detailing at the bodice, shoulders and sleeve cuffs, lightly ruffled throughout, femme off the collarline and cropped silhouette for a perfect fit to matching a bikini.

If you feel like exploring the other side of the dating world, you should sign up here and keep your fingers crossed for a rich, hot sugar daddy to take you out to dinner.

Interracial couples still need to meet someplace on this planet, and should hence be set up to confront the periodic gazes, agrees, whispering and double - crossing.

Hail Caesar skillfully set up the main religious lines that are put forth in the dying minutes of the movie when Caesar approaches Christ on the cross and the words should be set into stone... packaged within levels of the reality of Hollywood, communism, and a director who lives to make a positive + difference in this world...