Not exact matches
It was my decision, agreed upon by both
Crown and defence, that the
witnesses available would testify
in - chief to salvage what court time we could, but I was not going to ask the defence to cross-examine either
witness until he knew the complete
Crown's
case that he had to meet, that might be evidenced by the statements of the two recently identified officers who were at the scene.
«Instead of carefully reviewing the evidence
in the
case in order to determine whether or not the
Crown had,
in fact, established that the appellant possessed the specific intent of wilfulness required by s. 173 (1) of the Criminal Code, the trial judge erroneously convicted the appellant based upon a perceived (but non-existent) legal presumption that the necessary wilfulness was established by the fact that his acts of masturbation were
in fact
witnessed by another,» he wrote.
If the
Crown is put on notice or informed of the existence of potentially relevant information
in the hands of a third party, including information pertaining to the credibility or reliability of the
witnesses in a
case, the
Crown's duty to make reasonable inquiries of that third party is triggered.
In some
cases the magistrate merely says, on the basis that the
Crown witnesses and policemen are honest, that he finds the accused guilty.
I agree with Mr. Murphy that the evidence
in the Stanley
case was sufficiently problematic that an acquittal was a realistic possibility: a distinctly unsatisfactory RCMP investigation and key
Crown witnesses whose stories changed significantly would suffice even if Mr. Stanley's own explanation seemed far - fetched and was disbelieved, After all, not believing a
witness on a point is no evidence at all of the converse of what the
witness has stated.
The human rights aspect of the
case will be governed by whether or not the third party applied themselves to a disclosure application and upon the relevance criteria contained within the Magistrate's Court Act 1980, s 97 and the Criminal Procedure (Attendance of
Witnesses) Act 1965, s 2 (as amended)
in the
Crown Court.
His
case was initially set for trial
in December 2010, but adjourned due to the unavailability of a
Crown witness.
In more serious
cases, police officers may be called as
witnesses by the
Crown and then cross-examined by the defence.
Regina v. D.J. (2008) Client acquitted of Kidnapping, Forcible Confinement, Aggravated Assault and Conspiracy to Commit Assault
in the Ontario Court of Justice pursuant to skillful cross-examination of
witnesses and legal argument by Ms. Stacey Nichols which revealed that
Crown case did not meet required standard for conviction.
That quote will cover off all court appearances from first appearance to the trial or sentencing; it covers all letters and communications with you, the
Crown, experts; it covers all communications with parties including
witness preparation, and trial preparation; it covers the drafting of legal applications and arguments and the time spent researching relevant
case law; it also covers all costs associated with the presenting your
case in a brief to the
Crown as part of the plea bargaining process and / or the costs associated with a trial if the matter proceeds that way.
In some cases, the Crown will present the allegations by calling a witness (or witnesses) to testify in cour
In some
cases, the
Crown will present the allegations by calling a
witness (or
witnesses) to testify
in cour
in court.
The «Ammunition and Where to Find It» panel will offer our members the ways and means to obtaining third party and other pertinent records to assist
in either resolving the
case before trial, or
in an effective cross-examination of
crown witnesses.
Blouin, a provincial court judge
in Toronto, cut the
case short and acquitted the accused after hearing from the
Crown's only
witness, but before the defence was able to call its evidence, and before either side could make closing submissions.
During Trial, cross-examination of the police officer
witnesses by Vancouver Criminal Lawyer Emmet J. Duncan demonstrated serious problems with the
Crown case that Client was the person that was driving on the night
in question.
In this
case, it was pointed out, the
Crown had duly delivered a disclosure package to the defence, giving details of
witnesses» records and previous convictions.»
When there are allegations of sexual assault
in a
case, there is always a risk that an order not to disclose the complainant's identity has been made
in criminal proceedings — this order is mandatory upon demand by the
Crown, the complainant or a minor
witness (see 486.4 of the Criminal Code).
In both proceedings, the
Crown's
case relied on the testimony of
witnesses who had a motive to lie and who were therefore considered unsavoury.