Sentences with phrase «crucifixion do»

Tons of people that have a problem with a Good Friday crucifixion do not even consider the darkness (noon to 3 pm) as a part of the «reckoning».

What are a series of paintings featuring the crucifixion doing on show at New York's Jewish Museum?

It is impossible to understand Christianity as a whole, or the resurrection of Jesus in particular, until we have come to terms with what the crucifixion did to Jesus, and what it challenges us to do.

So the exact date of the crucifixion did not matter to him, and «that the resurrectionoccurred at all is a statement of faith rather than history» (p. 173).

Finally, just because the gospels do not give much detail about the crucifixion does not discount the rest of Scripture.

Not exact matches

Jesus foreshadowed the emotional pain of a loss even though you may «know» someone is in Heaven with the story about Lazarus and his sisters; being the one who set the ball in motion for Jesus» crucifixion wore heavily on Judas (if their beliefs were correct, he still had to do with the physical loss of Jesus; had they been wrong about the «divinity» of Jesus, he helped get his friend killed).

Daniel: Those bodies resurrected are an end - of - times occ - urrence — nothing to do with a «crucifixion» event.

Did he not like the Indian subcontinent or did one crucifixion become too much for hDid he not like the Indian subcontinent or did one crucifixion become too much for hdid one crucifixion become too much for him?

Don't tell me the story written at least 30 years AFTER his death is your evidence... any records of the trial, crucifixion, birth records?

Daniel: Those bodies resurrected are an end - of - times occurrence - nothing to do with a «crucifixion» event.

Muhammad may not have condemned Isa outright, but did give an alternate version of events surrounding the crucifixion and ressurection, an account that contradicts the Word of Isa.

But, then they don't have crosses anywhere in their churches because they believe He is alive and don't wish to dwell on the crucifixion and him dying on the cross.

The only logical explanation would be that he did not die on the cross and married his wife after the crucifixion.

The Romans didn't invent slavery, or crucifixion, or violence and oppression.

He was asked to preach on «the transfiguration» — which he did and then tied it in with the crucifixion.

-- Don't go around charging a specific group of people (Jews), for the crucifixion of Christ, when it is the likes of YOU and I that put Jesus on the cross.

Though we may not always understand why and how sin and suffering enters into God's world, one thing we can know through the crucifixion of Jesus is that God does not send sin and suffering, but rather, is a victim of it along with us.

(By the way, how the HELL did bunnies and colored eggs and chocolate ever get mixed up with Jesus and crucifixion / resurrection, anyway???)

We have become so familiar with the story that we do not see the crucifixion of Jesus for the evil thing it really was.

But then, we must see what God does with the cross in Jesus Christ, and how God reveals Himself to us in the crucifixion of Jesus, and more importantly, how God reveals us to ourselves in the crucifixion of Jesus.

No, he acted pretty normal, and did what most religious people of his day wanted him to do... to accuse Jesus of being a false Messiah and give Him over to the Roman officials for crucifixion.

Do you understand everything that occurred in the crucifixion of Jesus, and how central it is to your life and theology?

People sensed his lordship and, because they did, called for his crucifixion.

As for the real responsibility of Pilate or the Jewish leaders for the crucifixion, perhaps the most we can say is that the Romans crucified Jesus, but the Jewish authorities probably desired his death and did what they could to bring it about.

As Jesus says to his disciples shortly before his crucifixion, «You did not choose me but I chose you.»

The question with which we should approach them is, how did his followers, who knew that he had been put to death by crucifixion, come to be convinced that he was still alive?

Even crucifixion has nothing on what some societies in our not so distant past dished out as capital punishment.I don't wish to depict those methods here because if you desire you can look them up for yourself and be sick as a dog if you want.

This did not happen to all victims of crucifixion, but was known to occur.

Going back to the history of crucifixion, I do agree with the author that the nails were actually driven through the wrist rather than the palms because driving the nails through the wrist made it harder to tear lose.

For example, if you do an image search on Google for crucifixion, most of the images of Jesus are pretty clean.

The gospel is a wide - ranging message about what God has done for the entire world through the life, teachings, crucifixion, death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Any way you slice it, Jesus did not have the typical Roman crucifixion, and there's plenty of reason to suspect something fishy about this story.

Paul's new religion did not fit well with the Jewish beliefs held by the followers of Jesus (led after the crucifixion by Jesus» brother James).

When Jesus began saying and doing the things He said and did, He was not fulfilling any of the expectations, which confused many people, and eventually, led to His crucifixion.

For historical evidence of the Bible, just look up in your history books about the Assyrians and Babylonians taking over Israel several hundred years BCE, or that the Romans were in power during the time of Jesus, that they did use crucifixion as a form of execution.

Luke does not name the women who had followed Jesus from Galilee and who watched the crucifixion — but then Luke mentions only Jesus» mother among the women of the earliest church (Acts 1:14).

Christian faith in the victory of love does not depend on any single interpretation of the events following the crucifixion.

Judeo - Christianity did arise out of the crucifixion of a Jewish teacher having a new way to bring about a more benevolent and less murderous tradition that the Romans did aspire toward.

Why did hundreds of people see him walking around and talking after the crucifixion — oh, wait, is suppose you think the Romans were incompetent at killing?

He examines the speeches in Acts and also the editorial skeleton in Mark, and he finds that they follow a more or less common pattern: the ministry began with the «baptism» of John, that is, his message of repentance and work as a baptizer; following John's arrest, Jesus began his own ministry in Galilee, and there «went about doing good,» and «healing all that were possessed by the devil»; then he came up to Jerusalem, where the rulers put him to death by crucifixion; on the third day he rose again, and appeared to his disciples, who were now «witnesses» to the truth of these reported events, namely to his resurrection from the dead.

In a study of his earlier pictures, Kolker notes that «Scorsese is interested in the psychological manifestations of individuals who are representative either of a class or of a certain ideological grouping; he is concerned with their relationship to each other or to an antagonistic environment... [and finally] there is no triumph for his characters» (A Cinema of Loneliness [Oxford University Press, 19881, p. 162) The Jesus of the Last Temptation fits this pattern (as do Travis Bickel in Taxi Driver, Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull and Paul Hackett in After Hours) By eschewing any reference to a resurrection — and, in an interesting theological note, allowing Paul to suggest that his preaching of the risen Christ is more important than the Jesus of history — Scorsese presents the crucifixion as the final willful act of a man driven by a God who makes strange demands on his followers.

(For link fans, the video & notes may be found at http://www.calvaryccm.com/teachings/main/video/GS49.aspx) He made a very valid point: if the crucifixion was all there was to life in Christ, Jesus and His Father could've «done it over the weekend,» rather than take 33 years... especially that last week.

John does add symbolic and interpretative touches to some of the incidents of the crucifixion.

that He had defeated death or satan, this crucifixion was a promise that He had to make perfectly clear to His enemy 1st before He could say to the world ALL those who were created in his image, that its done it is finished I did what I said I would do, if you decide you need me, I will be waiting, man talk about patience, and this isnt the kind of patience that your see when people are waiting in line and they arent tapping thier foot, this is called perfect Faith, that comes in trusting and know the end from the beginning, thats HUGE!

Why did it «have to» go through the gruesome act of the crucifixion to forgive us?

Though scrupulously concerned not to attribute Jesus» «failure» in any way to his own shortcomings, the Principle does not hesitate to blame the Jewish people's unbelief, John the Baptist's cowardice, and Judas» betrayal as the causes of the crucifixion, which was an ignominious setback for God's plan.

He can do whatever He wants, whether at the birth or the crucifixion or in - between.

If it really has been «done to death,» then I can think of numerous topics that have been done many times more than this topic (at least where I'm at and interact): faith, hope, love, prayer, fellowship, giving, good works, christian unity, salvation, grace, faith healing, being culturally relevant, the gospel, the resurrection, religion vs. relationship, tithing, worship, reverence, christian music, legalism, old vs. new covenant, Paul's conversion, miracles, gifts of the spirit, sign gifts, tongues, nativity, the disciples, crucifixion, materialism, mysticism, new age, atheism, i could probably list about 50 more if I thought about it.

Was the crucifixion only necessary for the people of that time because of the consciousness that held that there had to be shedding of blood or do we today still believe in a God who requires blood sacrifice?

Did the increased attention to violent crucifixion scenes arise from social changes in Western Europe?