Sentences with phrase «cubic feet less»

As a result, the Focus Electric has 9 cubic feet less storage capacity in that space than does its gas - powered sibling.

The trunk has 9.9 cubic feet, which is 3.4 cubic feet less than the straight hybrid version.

Although that's quite roomy, it's still about five cubic feet less than the Honda CR - V.

The Honda Civic has exactly three cubic feet less capacity, and the compact Forte beats the mid-sized Accord «s trunk size by 1.5 cubic feet.

It won't be as large or provide as much capacity as most of the other vehicles available in the segment, coming in at 13 cubic feet less than the Ford Transit Connect.

The Crosstrek's 22.3 - cubic - foot measurement is 12 cubic feet less than the Forester's, and the Forester's advantage opens up to nearly 23 additional cubic feet over the Crosstrek's 51.9 cubic feet with the second row folded.

At 13 cubic feet, trunk capacity increases slightly, but still falls near the bottom of the class — 2.5 cubic feet less than the largest.

Trunk capacity is also yet to be revealed, but insiders suggest it will be around 17.7 cubic feet, or 1.7 cubic feet less than that of the X3 due to the acute rake of the X4's rear window.

However, the 10.7 cubic feet of trunk volume is nearly three cubic feet less than the 2012 Camry Hybrid and, unlike the Camry, the rear seat does not fold for additional cargo room.

Its overall interior volume is only 4 cubic feet less than Civic as well.

A claimed 17.7 cubic feet of trunk space is just 0.4 cubic feet less than that offered by its more conventional four door sibling.

There's 8.1 cubic feet less of interior space in the new model, and that's perhaps most obvious in the cargo area, which shrinks by 3.8 and 4.9 cubic feet, depending on if the rear seats are upright or folded.

Subaru naturally prefers you think of it as the latter even though it has some twenty cubic feet less cargo space than a Honda CR - V.

AM: The Prius Prime also has 7 cubic feet less cargo space because of the battery.

It may not have a big engine or a lot of cargo space (3 cubic feet less trunk space than the gasoline model), but it does have something that no other four - door sedan has: a 50 mpg city EPA rating.

If the rear seats are folded forward (sadly, they don't go completely flat) and the parcel shelf is stowed under the cargo floor, you have 63.6 cubic feet of cargo space to fill, a bit more than in the 5 - series Touring but about 12 cubic feet less than in the X5.

With 1 cubic foot less passenger volume than a Hyundai Elantra GT, the Encore seems an unlikely candidate for ample interior space, but cabin packaging is excellent.

Not exact matches

Each mailpiece must measure.50 cubic foot or less, weigh 20 pounds or less, and the longest dimension may not exceed 18 inches.

The dryer offers 7.5 cubic feet of drying capacity which is less than some dryers on our list — but... MORE also gives you a second, independent drying rack located on top of the primary front - loading dryer drum.

The company says the device can fully extinguish a class B (fuel - based) fire in a room 2,100 cubic feet (60 cubic meters) or less and reduce fire temperatures from 1,000 to 300 degrees Fahrenheit (540 to 150 degrees Celsius) in less than 10 seconds.

That's not the Dart, which has thick A-pillars and overstuffed seats, and it seems like there's less room inside than its impressive 97.2 cubic feet of passenger volume and 42.2 inches of rear - seat legroom promise.

By comparison, the Ford Focus RS features 23.8 cubic feet behind the seats and a lesser 44.8 cubic feet total because of its more sloping roofline.

Cargo & Towing With all seats upright, including the available third row, the X5 has only 7.1 cubic feet of cargo room, which is less room than you'll find in many compact sedans.

Despite the fact that the GX 460 has less cargo space than either the Mercedes - Benz GL - Class (93.8 cubic feet) or the Infiniti QX56 (95.1 cubic feet), the GX 460's 91.9 cubic feet was enough for my family's day - to - day needs.

The less expensive Volvo XC70 has 33.3 cubic feet.

A measly 13.2 cubic feet of trunk space is less than what a compact sedan like the 2013 Hyundai Elantra offers, at 14.8 cubic feet.

Maximum cargo volume in the Gran Coupe is rated 45.9 cubic feet with the rear seats folded flat, which is significantly less than the wagon, at 53 cubic feet, and the GT, at 56.5 cubic feet.

The area offers 15.5 cubic feet of cargo volume, less than the 2010 5 Series wagon's 17.7 cubic feet.

When all three rows are in place, there's just 16.6 cubic feet of space behind the third row — less than the prior - generation Armada (20 cubic feet), the Expedition (18.6) and the Sequoia (18.9); only the Tahoe offers less (15.3).

That's less than the Equinox, at 31.5 cubic feet, as well as the Subaru Forester at 33.5, Escape at 34.3, CR - V at 37.2 and RAV4 at 38.4 cubic feet.

Similarly sized (but considerably less expensive) models like the Ford Fiesta and Chevrolet Sonic hatchbacks have more room behind the backseat — 14.9 and 19 cubic feet, respectively — while the Hardtop has more maximum volume than the Fiesta (25.4 cubic feet) but less than the Sonic (47.7 cubic feet).

The Pilot is rated at 47.7 cubic feet, so the difference between the two models there is less significant than it is behind the third row.

Like the Porsche, the R8 makes for a compelling four - seasons car — except that it has even less storage space behind the seats and holds an even less generous 3.5 cubic feet in the luggage bay, plus it's even harder to see out of.

It drops level with the cargo floor and expands the volume to 47.7 cubic feet, which is a little more than you get in the Explorer when its third row is down (43.8 cubic feet) but less than the 68.8 cubic feet of space behind the Traverse's second row.

The highest, 3.2 L trim level has slightly less volume, 9.3 and 5.4 cubic feet, simply because it requires two trunk - mounted 6 - volt batteries (wired in series) in place of the other versions» smaller 12 - volt case.

Because the Ridgeline's independent rear suspension takes up far less space than a live axle, Honda was able to add a large compartment under the truck bed, providing a clean and dry home to the spare tire (either the standard mini-spare or available full - size) and, more significant, an 8.5 - cubic - foot trunk.

Hybrid models, however, have less trunk space: 11.6 cubic feet.

At 23 cubic feet, cargo capacity behind the rear seats isn't terrible, but it's far less than the 38 - plus found in the GLE.

Nissan Rouge, meanwhile, is better for solo artists: it's cargo space is nearly 10 - cubic - feet less than what you get in Honda CR - V.

Because of the batteries, the hybrid also has slightly less trunk space: 13.3 cubic feet compared with 15.1 for the standard model.

The 2018 Toyota Camry has more room in the rear seat, but less space overall, with the passenger volume coming in at 100.4 cubic feet.

Flipping and tumbling both sides to their forward position increases cargo capacity from 24.4 cubic feet to 68.9 cubic feet (marginally less with the optional sunroof).

It offers a modest cargo bay of 29.4 cubic feet, which is more space than an Infiniti FX35, but less than offered by the Acura MDX.

Trunk space is limited, with only 9.4 cubic feet at most, even less with a spare tire.

Also in every review you will read that the cubic feet is less in the Nissan with all seats folded.

The Hybrid has just 11.6 cubic feet, about four less than all other Malibus.

At 27 cubic feet, the cargo hold has less space than what my compact station wagon offers, but it's still ahead of competitors like the Porsche Macan and Mercedes - Benz GLC.

There's 4.48 cubic feet in the trunk, which is only slightly less than the 4.59 found in the soft top.

By switching to lithium - ion batteries, there's less trunk space lost (four cubic feet out of 16) and the rear seats fold flat, allowing a pass - through so you can take the 55 - inch flat panel TV home with you instead of paying for delivery.

Lastly, the Pilot maxes out at only 87 cubic - feet of cargo room, which is nearly 20 cubic - feet less that the 2013 Traverse.