Do
cult movies need to win a fervent if small following or can the cult consist of the lonely vigil of a single supplicant?
Not exact matches
Napoleon Dynamite only
needed the
movie for it to become a
cult classic, but the show only over kills it.
This film is actually terrible — I mean, yeah — it is scary in the sense that its creepy, but I think, really, the film is just the byproduct of global DVD residuals from the directors father — allowing Panatos to string together a series of overproduced, overgrained interior sequences, cheap synth score and a slasher
movie ending, and trying to pass it off as a «
cult movie», when really we, the audience,
need to know who, what or where the protagonist is coming from, what her dramatic
need is, who she interacts with, and so on.
One thing we can all agree upon: a
cult movie doesn't
need to remain obscure, but can achieve widespread critical respectability and public awareness over time.
some people are being picky and trying to pass themselves of as a know it all film critic... if you went into this
movie with your brain in anything higher than 1st gear you are a fool, i went looking for a bit of action and a salute to a
cult classic and i got what i wanted @ 25 «if anybody thinks either Topher Grace or Adrien Brody could stand - up to a Predator seriously
needs to consider suicide.»
I really look forward to the next release of art from Gallery 1988, in fact they have a yearly calender that is also released if you
need more
cult movie art.
Which other
cult movie favourites
need a gender swap?
There are also a number of Hong Kong
movies I
need to rank: City On Fire, The Legend Of Fong Sai - yuk, Tai Chi Master, Kung Fu
Cult Master, etc..