It's necessarily difficult to discuss the merits and implications of
cultural cognition if you aren't familiar with the theory, of if you don't engage with the theory itself (not the least because your understanding may be incomplete).
Not exact matches
My point was that,
if we accept this basic story (it's too simple, even as an account of how
cultural cognition works; but that's in the nature of «models» & should give us pause only when the simplification detracts from rather than enhances our ability to predict and manage the dynamics of the phenomenon in question), then there's no reason to view the valences of the
cultural meanings attached to crediting climate change risk as fixed or immutable.
Or do you think
if someone (presumably someone who understands
cultural cognition) develops a set of communication strategies or guides that skip ahead to the end of the story and just provide those «seeding guidelines» to someone without an understanding of why this has a positive effect on polarization, it would suffice?
One recent study, published by Yale Law School's
Cultural Cognition Project, found that conservatives become less skeptical about global warming
if they first read articles suggesting nuclear energy or geoengineering as solutions.
I'd say it is clear that
cultural cognition & like forms of motivated reasoning vary,
if they do, only in degree in relatoin to «general intelligence» and that the variance is in the direction of people who are more intelligent being more prone to display it.
If you get information from outside the echo chamber you will just interpret that information in such a way as to confirm biases.the
cultural cognition project provides plenty of supporting evidence of this.
If it» is mostly a
cultural cognition influence then perhaps informed luke - warmers are having more of a
cultural impact then they did previously.
In your paradigm, our
cultural cognition reduces this and makes such communication by humans more time and use effective than
if we used the computer communication model.