Through
cultural evolution we take charge of much of our environment and that in turn changes the direction of natural selection of genes.
Not exact matches
«Because globalization as a culturally homogenizing and environment - devouring force is coming on so fast, there is a real danger that in just a few decades it could wipe out the ecological and
cultural diversity that
took millions of years of human and biological
evolution to produce.»
The special issue brings together researchers in biology, anthropology, archaeology, economics, psychology, computer science and more to explore the
cultural forces affecting human
evolution from a wider perspective than is usually
taken.
What happens next is «a question for our values, not science», says Fine, arguing for a world where
cultural and gender norms sit with
evolution, genetics and hormones to
take account of all the influences.
With a knack for finding the humor in the quirks of the American
cultural landscape, Hughes
takes us on a tour from the Mall of America in Minneapolis to what he calls the «maul» of America - Custer's last stand - stopping at road - sides and discoursing on sandwiches, the shape of cowboy hats, the
evolution of barn roofs, the 28.99 wording of jokes, the wearing of moustaches, and, of course, the telling features from tepees of different tribes.
Taking over all four floors of the Vancouver Art Gallery, this groundbreaking exhibition will offer an international survey of mashup culture, documenting the emergence and
evolution of a mode of creativity that has grown to become the dominant form of
cultural production in the early 21st century.
In this exhibition, New Peace
takes form through the imagined - trappings of a cult that worships matter and believes that reality and its cosmic, biological, and
cultural evolutions exist to create the greatest variation of form possible in the universe, and for matter to experience all variations of itself.
If you had
taken the trouble to read the all the post, you would see that the mechanisms of how innate skepticism detects collective deception, or incorrectly triggers on characteristics that are not indicative of collective deception, are completely independent of what the topics at issue are (i.e. work the same for any), and indeed these detection mechanisms are framed using principles that themselves stem from
evolution /
cultural evolution (so not from contested topic domains such as CC etc. that I or anyone else agrees or disagrees with).