Religio - cultural histories as well have been dictated and written by the religio - political and socio -
cultural power elites.
Not exact matches
As non-Arab peoples converted to Islam, they demanded a share of the
power initially wielded by an Arab
elite, and the Islamic empire of the caliphs broke down into a commonwealth - a commonwealth whose common denominator was broadly
cultural and religious rather than political.
Donald T. Critchlow's impressively researched Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism, a narrative of Schlafly's political career, explains that it was this unyielding quality of hers — her resolute refusal to cultivate the intellectual and
cultural elites of either coast, even the conservative intellectual and
cultural elites who were her natural ideological allies — that provided the astonishing
power that she managed to wield in American politics for more than three decades.
To quote Paul Brass in his essay on ethnicity and nationalism, «The
cultural and religious forms, values and practices of South Asian countries have become political resources of the
elite in competition for political
power and economic advantages.»
On the other hand, the religio -
cultural elites are often themselves the
power elites in the society.
For example, Shamanism, Buddhism and Confucianism are used by the
power elites of Korea and other parts of East Asia to rule and subjugate the people and dictate their
cultural life.
Such
cultural violence may take the form of
cultural deprivation through the monopoly of
cultural institutions by the
power elite of a given civilization, or
cultural repression through the arbitrary imposition of the values and norms of the powerful.
The
power elites have manipulated the people's religio -
cultural practices for the maintenance and expansion of their own
power.
Liberals largely have higher education, the
elite newspapers and time mainline churches on their side, as conservatives never tire of pointing out; for angry conservatives, the
cultural power of American liberalism is suffocating and immense.
But it is our great collective misfortune that the scientific community made its decisive diagnosis of the climate threat at the precise moment when those
elites were enjoying more unfettered political,
cultural, and intellectual
power than at any point since the 1920s.