In her Ph.D. research, Rebecca is working towards an understanding of what insights from the field of critical studies and
cultural theory of girls studies can bring to law and legal studies.
Cultural cognition is one of a variety of approaches designed to empirically test
the cultural theory of risk associated with Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavsky.
There I rehearsed the account that the «
cultural theory of risk» gives for climate change conflict.
«
The cultural theory of risk for climate change adaptation.»
Lebow, Richard Ned 2008:
A Cultural Theory of International Relations.
If Lebow's
cultural theory of International Relations is any guide, then we must take into account the emotive concepts of fear, standing and revenge.
Not exact matches
ACC Accounting & Auditing, AFR Africa, AGE Economics
of Ageing, AGR Agricultural Economics, ARA Arab World, BAN Banking, BEC Business Economics, CBA Central Banking, CBE Cognitive & Behavioural Economics, CDM Collective Decision - Making, CFN Corporate Finance, CIS Confederation
of Independent States, CMP Computational Economics, CNA China, COM Industrial Competition, CSE Economics
of Strategic Management, CTA Contract
Theory & Applications, CUL
Cultural Economics, CWA Central & Western Asia, DCM Discrete Choice Models, DEM Demographic Economics, DEV Development, DGE Dynamic General Equilibrium, ECM Econometrics, EDU Education, EEC European Economics, EFF Efficiency & Productivity, ENE Energy Economics, ENT Entrepreneurship, ENV Environmental Economics, ETS Econometric Time Series, EUR Microeconomics European Issues, EVO Evolutionary Economics, EXP Experimental Economics, FDG Financial Development & Growth, FIN Finance, FMK Financial Markets, FOR Forecasting, GEO Economic Geography, GRO Economic Growth, GTH Game
Theory, HAP Economics
of Happiness, HEA Health Economics, HIS Business, Economic & Financial History, HME Heterodox Microeconomics, HPE History & Philosophy
of Economics, HRM Human Capital & Human Resource Management, IAS Insurance Economics, ICT Information & Communication Technologies, IFN International Finance, IND Industrial Organization, INO Innovation, INT International Trade, IPR Intellectual Property Rights, IUE Informal & Underground Economics, KNM Knowledge Management & Knowledge Economy, LAB Labour Economics, LAM Central & South America, LAW Law & Economics, LMA Labor Markets - Supply, Demand & Wages, LTV Unemployment, Inequality & Poverty, MAC Macroeconomics, MFD Microfinance, MIC Microeconomics, MIG Economics
of Human Migration, MKT Marketing, MON Monetary Economics, MST Market Microstructure, NET Network Economics, NEU Neuroeconomics, OPM Open Macroeconomics, ORE Operations Research, PBE Public Economics, PKE Post Keynesian Economics, POL Positive Political Economics, PPM Project, Program & Portfolio Management, PUB Public Finance, REG Regulation, RES Resource Economics, RMG Risk Management, SBM Small Business Management, SEA South East Asia, SOC Social Norms & Social Capital, SOG Sociology
of Economics, SPO Sports & Economics, TID Technology & Industrial Dynamics, TRA Transition Economics, TRE Transport Economics, TUR Tourism Economics, UPT Utility Models & Prospect
Theory, URE Urban & Real Estate Economics.
ACC Accounting & Auditing, AFR Africa, AGE Economics
of Ageing, AGR Agricultural Economics, ARA Arab World, BAN Banking, BEC Business Economics, CBA Central Banking, CBE Cognitive & Behavioural Economics, CDM Collective Decision - Making, CFN Corporate Finance, CIS Confederation
of Independent States, CMP Computational Economics, CNA China, COM Industrial Competition, CSE Economics
of Strategic Management, CTA Contract
Theory & Applications, CUL
Cultural Economics, CWA Central & Western Asia, DCM Discrete Choice Models, DEM Demographic Economics, DEV Development, DGE Dynamic General Equilibrium, ECM Econometrics, EDU Education, EEC European Economics, EFF Efficiency & Productivity, ENE Energy Economics, ENT Entrepreneurship, ENV Environmental Economics, ETS Econometric Time Series, EUR Microeconomic European Issues, EVO Evolutionary Economics, EXP Experimental Economics, FDG Financial Development & Growth, FIN Finance, FMK Financial Markets, FOR Forecasting, GEO Economic Geography, GRO Economic Growth, GTH Game
Theory, HAP Economics
of Happiness, HEA Health Economics, HIS Business, Economic & Financial History, HME Heterodox Microeconomics, HPE History & Philosophy
of Economics, HRM Human Capital & Human Resource Management, IAS Insurance Economics, ICT Information & Communication Technologies, IFN International Finance, IND Industrial Organization, INO Innovation, INT International Trade, IPR Intellectual Property Rights, IUE Informal & Underground Economics, KNM Knowledge Management & Knowledge Economy, LAB Labour Economics, LAM Central & South America, LAW Law & Economics, LMA Labor Markets - Supply, Demand & Wages, LTV Unemployment, Inequality & Poverty, MAC Macroeconomics, MFD Microfinance, MIC Microeconomics, MIG Economics
of Human Migration, MKT Marketing, MON Monetary Economics, MST Market Microstructure, NET Network Economics, NEU Neuroeconomics, OPM Open Macroeconomics, PBE Public Economics, PKE Post Keynesian Economics, POL Positive Political Economics, PPM Project, Program & Portfolio Management, PUB Public Finance, REG Regulation, RES Resource Economics, RMG Risk Management, SBM Small Business Management, SEA South East Asia, SOC Social Norms & Social Capital, SOG Sociology
of Economics, SPO Sports & Economics, TID Technology & Industrial Dynamics, TRA Transition Economics, TRE Transport Economics, TUR Tourism Economics, UPT Utility Models & Prospect
Theory, URE Urban & Real Estate Economics.
The charges went higher and higher up the ladder
of generality until the sex crime committed at UVA became a confirmation
of the basic
theory of privileged Western male oppression that is so widely subscribed to in the disciplines
of cultural studies.»
This presupposition is the radical's equivalent to the reactionary's copy
theory of cultural framing.
To interpret
cultural and religious differences in terms
of a
theory of interests works no better than to ignore the role
of class interests within all societies.
To be sure, it took more than a biological
theory to set in motion all the
cultural forces which were beginning to reshape the ethos
of the West in the mid-nineteenth century.
Still others have blamed the persistent racism
of Southern religion, the
cultural captivity
of Southern regionalism, the eschatological pessimism
of premillennialist ideology, right «wing conspiracy
theories, and so forth: There is no shortage
of explanations.
Because
of the
cultural changes
of modernity, however, the just war tradition has been carried, developed, and applied not as a single
cultural consensus but as distinct streams in Catholic canon law and theology, Protestant religious thought, secular philosophy, international law, military
theory and practice, and the experience
of statecraft.
At the same time, he rejects those
theories, «more or less tinged with behaviouristic psychology,» which assume» that human nature has no dynamism
of its own and that psychological changes are to be understood in terms
of the development
of new «habits» as an adaptation to new
cultural patterns.»
The
theory of the identity
of religion with the sum total
of man's
cultural and social life does not do justice to its peculiar nature.
Though this
theory of knowledge as detached reflection appeals to our
cultural prejudices, formed as they are by an unreflective scientism, it is a relatively modern notion that has been thoroughly dismantled by the phenomenological tradition.
(a) Philosophical preoccupation with the various types
of cultural activities on an idealistic basis (Johann Gottfried Herder, G. W. F. Hegel, Johann Gustav Droysen, Hermann Steinthal, Wilhelm Wundt); (b) legal studies (Aemilius Ludwig, Richter, Rudolf Sohm, Otto Gierke); (c) philology and archeology, both stimulated by the romantic movement
of the first decades
of the nineteenth century; (d) economic
theory and history (Karl Marx, Lorenz von Stein, Heinrich von Treitschke, Wilhelm Roscher, Adolf Wagner, Gustav Schmoller, Ferdinand Tonnies); (e) ethnological research (Friedrich Ratzel, Adolf Bastian, Rudolf Steinmetz, Johann Jakob Bachofen, Hermann Steinthal, Richard Thurnwald, Alfred Vierkandt, P. Wilhelm Schmidt), on the one hand; and historical and systematical work in theology (church history, canonical law — Kirchenrecht), systematic theology (Schleiermacher, Richard Rothe), and philosophy
of religion, on the other, prepared the way during the nineteenth century for the following era to define the task
of a sociology
of religion and to organize the material gathered by these pursuits.7 The names
of Max Weber, Ernst Troeltsch, Werner Sombart, and Georg Simmel — all students
of the above - mentioned older scholars — stand out.
The recent work
of German sociologist Jurgen Habermas, in which questions about the formal characteristics
of social systems in general and the dynamics
of the lifeworld are the focus, exhibits a clear preference for deductive
theory of a prescriptive sort.13 Habermas has drawn eclectically from modernization
theory and Marxism to create what he calls a reconstructive model
of cultural evolution.
Lifeworld colonization
theory credits secular
cultural patterns (e.g., rational communication processes) with an active role in social change, but it minimizes the importance
of religion.
That being said, the renewal
of interest ought not to be overstated: much doctrinal theology in English remains preoccupied with keeping up a conversation with other fields
of inquiry (often literary and
cultural theory) and is so eager to do so that it often neglects the descriptive or dogmatic tasks
of systematics.
Just as there are clear
cultural differences that in turn influence the course
of therapy (by whatever name), the
theory should be able to illustrate the fundamental similarities.
A short time later, when be deduced the
theory of natural selection to explain the adaptations in which he had previously seen the handiwork
of God, Darwin knew that be was committing
cultural murder.
Ginzberg learned this stage
theory of cultural development from the French philosopher August Comte, the father
of positivism.
Niebuhr dismissed them by saying that «the «
cultural lag»
theory of human evil is completely irrelevant to the analysis
of... sin (NDM 250).»
Thus understood, the doctrine
of radical evil can furnish a receptive structure for new figures
of alienation besides the speculative illusion or even the desire for consolation —
of alienation in the
cultural powers, such as the church and the state; it is indeed at the heart
of these powers that a falsified expression
of the synthesis can take place; when Kant speaks
of «servile faith,»
of «false cult,»
of a «false Church,» he completes at the same time his
theory of radical evil.
(24) Structuralism, the critical
theory that asserts that meaning is a function
of the structures
of a
cultural system, presumes communities that give rise to and nurture the structures
of that culture.
I myself would prefer to speak
of natural law grounding human rights (this is perhaps the only misstep in the book); but in any event his wider point is no doubt correct that only a
theory of natural law can rescue the campaign for human rights from being anything more than disguised power politics or
cultural imperialism.
His colleague George Lindbeck added an insistence on the primacy
of language over experience and a
theory about religion as a
cultural - symbolic medium.
I think Carl Jung came up with some good ways
of thinking about our
cultural images and how they come about — that scientists many hundreds or thousands
of years later might have the same sorts
of cultural images informing their intuitions, and thus using those images as the basis for a
theory of evolution is not so much extraordinary than it is to be expected.
Nevertheless, it takes seriously the developments in critical Bible studies, the new insights gained from the social sciences
of cultural anthropology and sociology, the impact
of technology and political
theory in rapid
cultural change and the issues raised by cross-
cultural communication on a global scale.
Alternatively, one might expect to see the
cultural or historical importance
of Darwin or the
theory of evolution underscored and interpreted in the remainder
of AI or the main text
of SMW.
I thought Evangel readers would appreciate knowing about my Christianity Today interview with James Davison Hunter, Professor
of Religion, Culture, and Social
Theory at the University
of Virginia and author
of To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy and Possibility
of Christianity in the Late Modern World (Oxford, 2010), which promises to be the most important book written on Christian
cultural engagement in the last 50 years.
I have slightly improved the thrust
of this quotation: Whitehead actually (somewhat embarrassingly) claims that the «struggle for existence gives no hint why there should be cities» even though Hobbes» social
theory provides just such an account, illustrating that
cultural change and even transformation per se has necessarily little to do with the issue
of evolution.
3At present, for example, the well - entrenched neo-Darwinian hypothesis
of «gradualism» (biological evolution occurs slowly, and more or less continuously as the constant interplay
of random variations and natural selection over vast periods
of time) is confronted with a somewhat more radical and neo-Lamarckian
theory of «punctuated equilibrium» favored by Harvard biologists Stephen Jay Gould and Peter Williamson, collaborated by fossil discoveries
of paleontologist and
cultural anthropologist Richard Leakey in Africa.
In providing an Archimedes point from which to view the major contours
of an entire
cultural epoch, however, such
theories can be enormously useful.
There are
theories —
theories of religious and
cultural evolution — that are relevant to these questions.
In tracing broad processes
of social and
cultural change, these
theories also offer some guidance in thinking about the possible direction
of changes in the future.
America is a mixed - up national project, unlikely to satisfy the exacting ideals
of a theologian, political philosopher, or
cultural theorist, and yet preternaturally successful, perhaps because it is a nation and society largely in accord with basic human sensibilities that resist reduction to neat
theories and pat principles.
It is,
of course, necessary to recognize that such
theories depend to a great extent on the kinds
of values and presuppositions built into the larger
cultural environment from which they emerge.
But if we move out
of the global economy into the
cultural influence, globalization
theory suffers from the Narcissism McLuhan disdained.
That Garber has written a competent and straightforward study
of Shakespeare is a good thing, but her participation in the vulgarities
of cultural studies and queer
theory is not thereby cancelled.
Declaring a religious /
cultural myth to be a
theory demonstrates ignorance
of both science and faith — and in its way — the most profound contempt for both.
The «
cultural - linguistic» model constituted a genuine third way because it claimed that coherentist and correspondence
theories of truth need not oppose each other, since a coherentist thesis could eventually be said to correspond to reality as a kind
of lived proposition.
Precisely with regard to these transitional situations which, in view
of the present deficits in ecological and social - technological
theory, particularly become the center
of cultural attention, Whitehead has set new tasks.
This article examines Whitehead's
theory of perception to indicate how this
theory provides a philosophical reinterpretation for two issues
of concern to feminists: criticism
of cultural symbols, including language, and the importance
of intuition and emotion, usually associated with women, in experience.
Besides the ways Whitehead's
theory of symbolic reference supports feminist attempts to purge
cultural symbols from their sexist and patriarchal connotations, it seems clear from the following passage that Whitehead would applaud feminist hopes
of producing symbols more faithful to women's experience.
In an ambitious project to assess the correctness
of Talcott Parsons»
theory of evolutionary universals, Gary Buck accumulated masses
of data for 115 contemporary nation - states from every part
of the world.7 He developed elaborate indices (as
of 1960 wherever possible)
of the ten variables Parsons discussed: (1) communication, (2) kinship organization, (3) religion, (4) technology, (5) stratification, (6)
cultural legitimation, (7) bureaucratic organization, (8) money and market complex, (9) generalized universalistic norms, and (10) democratic association.8 Information was taken from such sources as the United Nations Statistical Yearbook, the Yearbook
of Labor Statistics, and UNESCO's World Survey
of Education.
His
theory of symbolism then, is not only compatible with feminist goals
of revising and renewing
cultural symbols, but also provides a systematic analysis which gives philosophical support and impetus to these goals.
After reviewing the
theories of Malinowski, Freud, Girard and others on the role
of fatherhood, Steinmetz uses the story
of Oedipus to illustrate the problem; a father wants to insure immortality by passing on all
of his «self» (both material and
cultural) to an heir, but in so doing insures his own mortality and displacement.