Sentences with phrase «cumulative additional emissions»

These cumulative additional emissions savings would not only be a meaningful contribution toward a global effort to help limit some of the worst consequences of climate change; it can be done cost - effectively.

Not exact matches

Cumulative fossil fuel emissions in this scenario are ∼ 129 GtC from 2013 to 2050, with an additional 14 GtC by 2100.

Finally, to revisit the question originally posed @ 203: Assuming the IEO2011 Reference case of «1 trillion metric tons of additional cumulative energy - related carbon dioxide emissions between 2009 and 2035», and given that this case equates to following RCP8.5 until 2035 as previously demonstrated @ 408, what increase in average global surface temperature relative to pre-industrial would result by 2035?

«It's not a time bomb; it's an important additional cumulative emissions source,» he told me.

Assuming the IEO2011 Reference case of «1 trillion metric tons of additional cumulative energy - related carbon dioxide emissions between 2009 and 2035», and given that this case equates to following RCP8.5 until 2035 as previously demonstrated @ 408, what increase in average global surface temperature relative to pre-industrial would result by 2035?

Their unwillingness to take immediate action is intellectually and morally bankrupt because unless carbon emissions are stopped very soon (remember that the damage is cumulative so continuing to emit at current of even reduced rates still causes additional damage hundreds if not thousands of years into the future.)

Cumulative fossil fuel emissions in this scenario are ∼ 129 GtC from 2013 to 2050, with an additional 14 GtC by 2100.

FERC's ruling document cited research by RFF experts that estimated the proposed policy would have resulted in an additional 53 million tons of annual CO2 emissions and 27,000 cumulative premature deaths by 2045.

Cumulative emissions (2012 — 2100) are about 1,160 Gt CO2 for fossil fuels, with an additional 110 Gt CO2 for LUCF, and 35 Gt CO2 after 2100 assuming continued exponential decline.

Overall the G8 pathway has cumulative carbon dioxide emissions (2012 — 2100) of 1,485 Gt CO2 for fossil fuels, and 125 for LUCF, with an additional 45 GtCO2 after 2100 assuming continued exponential decline.

This appears to me to comport with the «IEO2011 Reference case projects about 1 trillion metric tons of additional cumulative energy - related carbon dioxide emissions between 2009 and 2035» that you cited in # 143, which clearly states CO ₂ in the sentence.

We want to know the total cumulative emissions, in other words how much additional CO2 we emitted during the period, above and beyond whatever we'd already emitted by 2009.

Specifically, the IEO2011 projects about 1 trillion metric tons of additional cumulative energy - related carbon dioxide emissions between 2009 and 2035 (page 143).

1 ppm CO2 = 2.12 Gt C (CDIAC) 2.12 Gt C = 7.76 Gt CO2 (C to CO2 ratio of 3.67, ThinkProgress) thus 1 ppm CO2 = 7.76 Gt CO2 «1 trillion metric tons of additional cumulative energy - related carbon dioxide emissions between 2009 and 2035» (IEO2011, p. 143) = 129 ppm of additional CO2 (divide 1,000 Gt CO2 by 7.76)

1) What will the impact (of the additional 1,000 Gt CO2) be on total global cumulative CO2 emissions?

The worksheets available below constitute the details each entity's production of oil & NGLs, natural gas, coal, and cement from as early as 1854 to 2010, as well as additional sources of emissions (such as vented CO2, flared CO2, own fuel use, and vented or fugitive methane), non-energy uses of oil, gas, and coal, emission factors for each fuel, calculation of emissions attributed to each Carbon Major producer, and several summary worksheets by fuel and for cumulative emissions by all entities.