This approach is complementary to the approach of estimating
cumulative emissions allowed to achieve a given limit on global warming [12].
Not exact matches
Other scientists have criticized the planetary boundaries as too generous (for example,
allowing too much human appropriation of freshwater flows) or employing the wrong metric (atmospheric concentrations of CO2 rather than
cumulative emissions of greenhouse gases).
Although they also show graphically the spread of CO2 concentrations associated with their model runs, they don't report them in a way that
allows easy analysis in
cumulative emissions terms.
The relationship between
cumulative emissions and peak warming
allows us to show how delaying mitigation in the short term creates the need for more rapid
emission reductions later, in order to stay below a given
cumulative emissions limit.
«The BLM's environmental analysis for the March lease sale completely fails to quantify of the very real, direct greenhouse gas
emissions that will result from
allowing these areas to be drilled and fracked and both analyses fail to quantify
cumulative impacts from greenhouse gases.
The purpose of the «social cost of carbon» (SCC) estimates presented here is to
allow agencies to incorporate the social benefits of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2)
emissions into cost - benefit analyses of regulatory actions that impact
cumulative global
emissions.
This linear relationship is a useful insight, because it means that for any target ceiling for temperature rise (e.g. the UN's commitment to not
allow warming to rise more than 2 °C above pre-industrial levels), we can easily determine a
cumulative emissions budget that corresponds to that temperature.