Wasdell said that the draft submitted by scientists contained a metric projecting
cumulative total anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, on the basis of which a «carbon budget» was estimated — the quantity of carbon that could be safely emitted without breaching the 2 degrees Celsius limit to avoid dangerous global warming.
Thus, two models with the same level of
cumulative total anthropogenic CO2 emissions may reach different atmospheric CO2 concentrations (see Smith and Edmonds 2006).
Not exact matches
«(iii) by country, annual
total, annual per capita, and
cumulative anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases for the top 50 emitting nations;
I am not sure I get how you arrived at this: «During this period,
anthropogenic CO2 emissions amounted to about 20 % of the
total CO2 emissions» I suspect you may be forgetting that the emissions are
cumulative, so even a flat blue line would go with a rising orange one.
To put the necessary cap on
total cumulative greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leaders also agreed on net - zero emissions; that is, there must be «a balance between
anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in the second half of this century».1
Because all 2013 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenarios — except Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6 (RCP2.6), which leads to the
total radiative forcing of greenhouse gases of 2.6 W m − 2 in 2100 — imply that
cumulative carbon emission will exceed 1,000 Gt in the twenty - first century, our results suggest that
anthropogenic interference will make the initiation of the next ice age impossible over a time period comparable to the duration of previous glacial cycles.»