In this report, we examine this accountability system in the context of vocational education and
current accountability measures.
Both versions that have passed in their respective chambers allow for states to end
current accountability measures enforced by high - stakes testing if they develop their own alternatives.
This followed concerns that
current accountability measures encourage schools to «play the system» to boost their league - table standing.
However, with regard to adequate yearly progress, state officials do not expect a great deal of flexibility from federal officials and have conceded that
their current accountability measure, the Academic Performance Index, is not likely to meet federal regulations.
Not exact matches
And in the
current educational - policy environment — in which
accountability, based on empirical data, is valued so highly — if you can't clearly identify and
measure skills, it's hard to convince people to take them seriously.
In good
measure, the failures of the
current system have festered as long as they have because many of the advocates of test - based
accountability simply didn't want to face the evidence.
With better
measures of academic growth and a little extra money, states could attract providers to underserved populations, rather than discouraging them as a result of the requirements of
current accountability systems.
«Test scores can form the starting point for
accountability, but we aim to combine our qualitative and quantitative
measures to look forward and inform ourselves and our community about
current performance and improvement needed.»
The report, part of a book of essays entitled «The Future of Assessment: 2025 and Beyond», suggests that
current trends in the education sector are «narrowing the curriculum and focusing on those students whose performance has the greatest impact on the headline
accountability measures».
Current time - and age - based
accountability measures have a stronghold on schools, even those trying to break away from the factory model of education.
While elements such as state standards,
accountability measures, and value added
measures are gaining acceptance, other important components, especially performance - based pay and increased choice options, are opposed by powerful forces — such as the politically connected teachers unions — with vested interests in the
current system.
English Language Learners and complexity theory: Why
current accountability systems do not
measure up.
Value - added
measures have caught the interest of policymakers because, unlike many of the uses of test scores in
current accountability systems, it purports to «level the playing field» so that value - added
measures of teachers» effectiveness do not depend on characteristics of the students.
One of the implicit assumptions of the
current accountability system is that, when it comes to the
measured outcomes, it is not possible for all schools to excel.
In order to create and maintain a culture of high expectations, the board must be conversant in the
measures of the
current and evolving state
accountability system.
Current accountability systems rely predominantly on the «percent of children reaching proficiency,» which educational measurement experts call a «status»
measure.
In the
current landscape where standards,
accountability assessments, and use of student value - added
measures to evaluate teachers prevail, the researchers expanded survey respondents to include students to better understand their awareness and what value — if any — they perceive in educational testing.
News Release Thursday, February 16, 2012 at 6 pm Media Contact: Van Schoales, CEO, A + Denver (303) 725-1151
[email protected] The Denver Plan and the Board of Education: Time to reevaluate the strategic plan to reflect
current priorities and
accountability measures.
Monday's forum will seek to scrutinize assumptions behind school
accountability and other
current school «reform»
measures.
Little mention is made of our reality here, however, given the real and deleterious effects we witness, for example, as
current teacher educators when we work with potential / future teachers who almost daily express serious concerns about joining a profession now with very little autonomy, not much respect, and a stark increase in draconian
accountability measures that will be used to hold them accountable for that which they do, or do not do well.
Replace the
current national
accountability scheme based on high stakes tests with state - led
accountability systems, returning responsibility for
measuring student and school performance to states and school districts.
As just posted on Diane Ravitch's blog, Randi Weingarten, the
current president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), has (finally) expressed her full opposition against using value - added models (VAMs), the statistical
measures of utmost interest on this blog, for teacher evaluation,
accountability, and merit pay purposes.
The
current NCLB
accountability system, at least as regards achievement, uses multiple
measures in a conjunctive way.
Her
current research interests include Earth Science education, learning progression development, and how science curricular practices are impacted by educational policies tied to standardized testing and
accountability measures.
«The
current educational
accountability system has become overly focused on narrow
measures of success and, in some cases, has discouraged schools from providing a rich curriculum for all students focused on 21st century skills they need to acquire.This particularly impacts under - resourced schools that disproportionally serve low - income and students of color.»
Not later than March 31, 2012, the Secretary shall take interim
measures to implement a similar safety fitness rating methodology in its
current safety rating system if the Compliance, Safety,
Accountability program is not fully implemented.