The researchers found that only a small fraction of fast - food eaters — as little as 8 percent — are likely to make healthy choices as a result of
current calorie labeling.
Not exact matches
The
current system of
calorie counting on which our nutrition
labels are based «provides only an estimate of the energy content of foods,» Malden C. Nesheim, a professor of nutrition at Cornell University, said at a 2013 meeting of the international nonprofit Institute for Food Technologists.
Under
current FDA regulations, dairy products containing artificial sweeteners (with a recent exception carved out for ice cream) must not only disclose those sweeteners in their ingredient listings but also bear prominent front
label notices — such as «reduced
calorie» or «reduced sugar» — as part of the products» so - called statements of identity.
Food
labels (
calories, added sugars): As the Washington Post puts it, the food industry is counting on the
current administration to back off on anything that might help us all make better food choices.
The only problem, industry representatives say, is that
current federal rules on such products require prominent «reduced
calorie»
labeling on the front of the package, which is «not attractive to children» and contributes to an «overall decline in milk consumption.»
Look at the
label on your
current bread you buy and see if you can find a lighter version with less
calories.
The proposed Nutrition Facts
label (right) has a few subtle differences from the
current label, including bolder
calorie counts and added sugar information.