«The study is of particular importance for
the current debate about climate change,» says Manning.
Not exact matches
Using the example of the
current debate surrounding anthropomorphic
climate change, Thompson sought to evaluate the argument from authority through a single prism, the way in which science is handled in argumentation
about public policy.
Mike Wallace's talk was
about the «National Research Council Report on the «Hockey Stick Controversy»... The charge to the committee, was «to summarize
current information on the temperature records for the past millennium, describe the main areas of uncertainty and how significant they are, describe the principal methodologies used and any problems with these approaches, and explain how central is the
debate over the paleoclimate record within the overall state of knowledge on global
climate change.»
Skeptical Climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball formerly of the University of Winnipeg in Canada wrote
about the
current state of the
climate change debate earlier this month:
«The primary focus of the Keep Calm
Climate Changes campaign is educating students about the facts behind the current climate change
Climate Changes campaign is educating students
about the facts behind the
current climate change
climate change debate.
The Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences, with their similar missions to promote the use of science to benefit society and to inform critical policy
debates, offer this new publication as a key reference document for decision makers, policy makers, educators, and other individuals seeking authoritative answers
about the
current state of
climate change science.
Then, replace «salt» with global warming and fears of too much CO2 as appropriate and you end up with a revealing new and quite readable article
about the
current climate change debate.