Many of
the current economic arguments against seem to fall in the same vein.
Not exact matches
The US letter says: «We have not seen a compelling scientific, legal or
economic argument for changing the
current regulatory regime...» Well, there are plenty scientific, legal and
economic arguments warranting the extension of the ban on advertising to 24 months.
He buttressed his
argument with the
current economic and power challenges facing the nation which he said the government...
Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition):
current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f) Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full
economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the
arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked about.
If you accept management's
argument that new orders lag an
economic recovery, then any realistic uptick in new order won't occur until 2012 based on the
current economic data.
The basic concept is viable if a convincing
economic argument can be presented to the communities of this region, the
current users of fossil fuel, and upon identifying the «parties» that will participate in creation of the necessary infrastructure.
The CJEU rightfully notes that this
argument did not so much pertain to the question whether state resources were present in the
current case, but if such access conferred a selective
economic advantage.
The AGs
arguments on both issues, first on the distinction between
economic and monetary policy and second on the prohibition of monetary financing, lead us to a much more fundamental question: Given the development of the monetary union, the lessons from the banking crisis and the
current economic situation in several Member States, can one really maintain the separation between monetary and
economic policy — that was artificial from the beginning — and the prohibition of monetary financing (as well as the prohibition of bailouts) in this form?
The Commission has reportedly already been working out the details of a proposal behind the scenes, contemplating how and — importantly — when the
argument that a strengthened external voice of the EMU is an integral part of the
current efforts to improve the
economic governance of the Eurozone can best be presented.
This
argument has some merit if lawyers who are in
economic association with non-lawyers, were immune from our
current duties, values and regulations — but, they would not.
The primary
argument is that these JDs are final actions that can be reviewed by the courts and the
current process to appeal a JD is long, burdensome and costly to property owners, hinders
economic development and hurts property rights.