Given the enormous changes taking place in the world,
the current education achievement gap between low - income and affluent students, and the logical nexus between a nation's economic strength and the quality of its public education system, it is incumbent on our country to put in place a national education strategy.
Not exact matches
When it comes to school reform, a
current wave of rhetoric and recent changes in federal
education policy, including the No Child Left Behind Act, have put the spotlight on the academic
achievement gap.
While
education advocates are focused on closing
achievement gaps and preparing every student for success, Michigan Assessment Consortium members believe neither will be possible if the
education system perpetuates
current assessment practices, which focus more on documenting success or failure than on supporting learning.
Below, I have provided a table which compares Utah and its
current elected State School Board model against the states which utilize Model IV in the following areas: ACT / SAT scores, graduation rates, graduation requirements, AP passage rates, charter schools, public
education climate for growing businesses, and closing the
achievement gap.
A thought - provoking essay in the
current issue of National Affairs by the prolific and sardonic Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute calls for a retreat from
education reform's long - held focus on closing the
achievement gap.
The convergence of sluggish growth in student
achievement, high turnover in the ranks of teachers, continuing
achievement gaps, and state and federal actions that have zeroed in on the capacity of the
current education system have set the stage for changes that are unparalleled in recent
education history.