The current electricity generation system is the way it is because this is what works.
Secondly, by creating profits from selling
the current electricity generation (made by old machines) money can be reinvested into new capacity.
Not exact matches
The increase in demand for
electricity, reduction in the quantity of water at the Akosombo Dam, irregular gas supply from the West Africa Gas Pipeline Company in Nigeria, irregular maintenance programmes and late procurement of crude oil to power
generation plants, have conspired to plunge the country in the
current power crisis.
The latter has set itself against the development of any new nuclear capacity, but trying to work out how far that will dictate the future of
electricity generation draws us into a complex area of the
current devolution settlement.
In sum, I am confused by how to think of the contribution of
current global coal
electricity generation to global warming.
But there's a new
generation of inductive bike lighting coming of age right now, which uses the naturally - generated eddy
currents from the spinning wheel of the bike to produce enough
electricity to drive bright (and energy - efficient) LED bulbs, and which promises to set cyclists free from the dreaded dead battery blues.
Given that a coal - fired
electricity generation plant produces about 1 ton of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour, Borenstein estimated that the price of greenhouse gas reductions would have to range from about $ 150 to $ 500 per ton of greenhouse gases to make the
current solar PV technology a worthwhile investment when greenhouse gas reductions are considered.
However, the NYT, to their credit, did cover the
current efforts by the BLM to sabotage the expansion of solar thermal
electricity generation in the U.S.: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/27/us/27solar.html — that would be the same BLM that has been working overtime to transfer public lands to fossil fuel interests for the past 8 years or so.
Although U.S. carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with
electricity generation have fallen from the 2005 level, they are projected to increase in the coming decades, based on analysis in EIA's Annual Energy Outlook 2015 (AEO2015) that reflects
current laws and regulations, and therefore does not include proposed rules such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan.
Many people seem to have an irrational fear of nuclear power
generation plants, just as people a century ago were fearful of domestic
electricity supplies using alternating
current.
The fundamental problem with the
current generation of wind turbines is that they are simply incapable of producing
electricity at prices that are economically viable and competitive with other sources.
In the case of a grid with 80 % renewables, the
generation capacity needs to be six times larger than the peak load, while the excess
electricity would be equal to 60 % of the EU's
current annual
electricity consumption.
: The
current Federal, State and private sector policies that are now increasing the fraction of
electricity generation from Intermittent Renewables must be stopped / reversed in order to avoid / mitigate very severe micro and macroeconomic impacts and National Security ramifications involving skyrocketing
electricity prices as well as dramatically reduced power grid reliability and resilience.
The same IEA report compares coal and oil's
current 46 per cent share of global
electricity generation to what it would be in 2030 under the 2 °C degree scenario.
The result: Though CSP requires the direct normal irradiance (DNI) found in abundance in the world's sunny high deserts, even importing
generation from high - DNI deserts in Spain and Morocco, CSP with thermal energy storage could become an economically competitive option, due to its ability with storage to fill the gaps created by intermittent
generation.Imports of thermal solar from Spain and Morocco would entail building HVDC (high Voltage Direct
Current) lines, because direct current is the most effective way to transport large amounts of electricity long - di
Current) lines, because direct
current is the most effective way to transport large amounts of electricity long - di
current is the most effective way to transport large amounts of
electricity long - distance.
The U.S. DOE's Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that it's the most expensive form of
electricity among
current technologies for new
electricity generation, about $ 396 per megawatthour for PV.
With NMBI legislation in place and carefull planning, taking into account likely closure dates of aging coal - fired power stations and potential depletion dates of
current coal and gas sources, NSW can have more renewable
electricity generation and grid - level storage in place in plenty of time to «keep the lights on».
These states have indicated their dissatisfaction with the
current electricity -
generation system by enacting binding RPSs, which require that wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, waste, or other renewable resources be used to generate up to 30 % of the
electricity sold by 2025.
Worldwide, the harnessing of wave power could generate a staggering 10,000 gigawatts of
electricity, more than double
current world
electricity generation of 4,000 gigawatts from all sources.
Mechanical energy derived from tidal movement, wave motion or ocean
current and exploited for
electricity generation.
Given that China is investing heavily in «next -
generation»
electricity transmission systems such as Ultra-High Voltage Direct
Current (UHVDC) power lines, this speaks directly to China's industrial strengths.
«The story of how California's electric system got to its
current state is a long and gory one,» Bushnell wrote, but «the dominant policy driver in the
electricity sector has unquestionably been a focus on developing renewable sources of
electricity generation.»
With NMBI legislation in place and carefull planning, taking into account likely closure dates of aging coal - fired power stations and potential depletion dates of
current coal and gas sources, Victoria can have more renewable
electricity generation and grid - level storage in place in plenty of time to «keep the lights on».
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, shallow waters along the eastern seaboard could host 530,000 megawatts of wind power, capable of covering more than 40 percent of
current U.S.
electricity generation.
Given that
current gas consumption for
electricity is 7.6 trillion cubic feet, gas consumption for
electricity generation should grow somewhere between twenty and forty percent.
However, it can also be used as a transportation fuel to displace petrochemicals and, with proper refinement, to displace any
current use for natural gas, such as at existing
electricity generation facilities.
For example, a build rate of 61 new reactors per year could entirely replace
current fossil fuel
electricity generation by 2050.
Given the evident concern about nuclear waste, it will be interesting to see if there is any reactions from young people to the governments recent admission that, on
current NDA plans, the proposed Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) is not expected to be available to take spent fuel from new nuclear power stations until around 2130, which they note «is approximately 50 years after the likely end of
electricity generation for the first new nuclear power station».
About 60 percent of Ontario's
current generation capacity is already accounted for by low - emission hydro or nuclear - generated
electricity, with the balance provided by natural - gas
generation and to a lesser extent by renewables.
Current generation land - based nuclear reactors cost $ 10,000,000 per megawatt capacity or about $ 5 billion for the power plant not counting the cost of the equipment to convert
electricity to fuel.
Scottish Power argues that under
current market rules if a DSR CMU (Capacity Market Unit - «a unit of
electricity generation capacity or
electricity demand reduction that can then be put forward in a future Capacity Market auction» according to the government definition), consisting of energy storage, is located behind the meter (BTM) it will not be subject to duration de-rating.
The
current world
electricity system operates at an average capacity factor of about 50 %, so that means about 64TW of
generation.
Beginning with a comprehensive overview of our
current energy system, the authors survey issues of energy supply and demand in key sectors of the economy, including
electricity generation, transportation, buildings, and manufacturing.
The authors claim that it would be feasible to replace 59 % of
current U.S. coal - fired
electricity generation with 214,000 to 236,000 (or potentially more than 366,000) large windmills.
«The greatest volatility in the
current electricity system is not solar and wind
generation, but the peaks and troughs in demand.»
This report addresses the
current status of coal in Turkey as an energy and greenhouse gas source, its impacts on health, the association between increasing the share of coal in
electricity generation and climate and economic policies, and the discussions on «clean coal».
Charts lie this are good for showing the reality of how slowly developments take place and the unlikelihood of a sudden massive breakthrough that suddenly reduces the cost by orders of magnitude (because that is what would be required, and even if energy storage was free, renewables like wind and solar would still not be viable at
current prices (or probably ever, IMO) to provide a major proportion of
electricity generation.
Consoli noted that the development of such systems, which would be decentralized, also has the benefit of empowering (in every sense of the word) people around the globe without access to
electricity, or the capital to create it with
current centralized
generation technologies.
But the issues of relevance here are: (a) whether you can have enough of it to avoid building more coal (
current situation in Germany says «no»); (b) whether you can have enough of it to displace
current coal; (c) whether you can have, store, and distribute, enough of it to meet future energy growth (especially in the developing world) and the conversion to an all - electric society; (d) whether you can run a modern society without baseload
generation [answer: perhaps, perhaps not, but if yes, it requires a complete reconfiguration of the way we manage
electricity].
Illustrative calculations indicate environmental damages are $ 330 - 970 billion yr − 1 for
current US
electricity generation (~ 14 — 34 cents per kWh for coal, ~ 4 — 18 cents for gas) and $ 3.80 (− 1.80 / +2.10) per gallon of gasoline ($ 4.80 (− 3.10 / +3.50) per gallon for diesel).
«FitzPatrick's full
electricity generation could be replaced with energy efficiency and wind at less than the
current cost of
electricity from the nuclear plant,» their research argued.
Alternatively, replacing this
generation with wind energy would require
electricity generation from wind to increase from its
current levels, 3.257 billion kWh (0.3 percent of total
electricity) to 399 billion kWh (35 percent of projected 2030
electricity generation), a more than 120-fold increase in wind
generation.
Anyway, in the
current legal proceedings the question arose whether the government measures leading to the partial diversion of the Acheloos river for water supply and
electricity generation purposes was in conformity with a number of EU directives on water policy.