Sentences with phrase «current federal no child»

Further, additional costs will come from the fact that California will be deemed «failing» under current federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandates.

Not exact matches

Because the current federal standards only prohibit «foods of minimal nutritional value» in cafeterias during mealtimes, children still have access to junk foods elsewhere on campus.

That's because federal child nutrition standards are intentionally aligned with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs), and the current DGAs permit consuming up to half of one's daily fruit intake come from juice.

«It's very possible that the state would pick up all the current (federal) standards,» said James Burke, assistant superintendent in charge of child nutrition for the Illinois Board of Education.

The only problem, industry representatives say, is that current federal rules on such products require prominent «reduced calorie» labeling on the front of the package, which is «not attractive to children» and contributes to an «overall decline in milk consumption.»

A national survey commissioned by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation — an independent private foundation focused on the optimal development of children — reveals that 9 out of 10 Americans support current federal efforts to keep school meals healthy.

Without a significant new investment in New York State's Child Care Block Grant, New York State will not be able to meet federal health and safety requirements and maintain the current number of child care subsiChild Care Block Grant, New York State will not be able to meet federal health and safety requirements and maintain the current number of child care subsichild care subsidies.

«I would still strongly encourage any child interested in science to pursue their dream and passion, but I hope that our current and future investment in NIH and other federal research support agencies will rise above any branch of government to help our next generation reach their potential and dreams.»

When it comes to school reform, a current wave of rhetoric and recent changes in federal education policy, including the No Child Left Behind Act, have put the spotlight on the academic achievement gap.

Children thus affected need the best instruction at the earliest possible time, but current federal definitions of LD preclude such a basic, sensible policy.

On the surface, the current dispute about Title I comparability (the requirement that schools within a district must receive comparable resources from state and local sources for education of disadvantaged children before federal funds are added on) is all about money.

This analysis examines whether the current mechanisms for providing federal education funding to disadvantaged children are effective and whether the system works as originally intended.

These and other results suggest that some of the most prominent ideas that dominate current policy debates — from supporting vouchers to doubling down on high - stakes tests to cutting federal education funding — are out of step with parents» main concern: They want their children prepared for life after they complete high school.

Even stretched across the entire period from birth to age five, it would work out to about $ 8,000 per child per year, without touching the separate federal child - care dollars, leveraging the Head Start appropriation, or tapping into other current public - sector spending on needy children (including the additional «stimulus» dollars that may or may not prove permanent).

Many people agree that the current federal education law No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is broken, but Congress is having trouble agreeing on how to fix it.

Recently, the Michigan Reading Association created the Advocacy Award to recognize a current sitting legislator (state or federal), or someone who advocates for Michigan children or adults to legislators, in the area of literacy.

Where Democrats and Republicans tend to agree is that the current method for evaluating schools, under the 10 - year - old federal No Child Left Behind law, is fatally flawed.

The ESSA replaces the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), and is the current version of a line of major federal education laws going back to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), first enacted fifty years ago.

Annual testing is a requirement of the current federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act, known as No Child Left Behind.

The current version of the law, the No Child Left Behind Act, created a federal system of testing and accountability, and many educators and policy makers contended that that law was too constraining and created some harmful side - effects.

The current version of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), called «No Child Left Behind» (NCLB), needs fundamental change.

Given the current federal policies I guess when the child you refer to fails a 4th grade reading test, the school system will be justified in firing all her teachers from kindergarten to the 4th grade.

«Our poll shows that school leaders are in favor of good nutrition for children but concerned with the unintended consequences of the current federal regulations.

The educators from across the country who developed ASCD's current legislative agenda believe that it's time for federal education policy to support this whole child approach, helping to ensure that all children are healthy, safe, engaged, supported, and challenged.

What: A frank discussion of the unintended consequences of the current No Child Left Behind Act and presentation of the Forum on Educational Accountability (FEA) recommendations to shift the focus of the federal law from penalties and compliance to a more meaningful framework for supporting improved learning and stronger school and district performance.

Changing the current evaluation system to focus on improved student outcomes, including objective measures of student growth, is critical to improving teacher effectiveness, raising student achievement, and meeting the objectives of the federal «No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.»

What we know with certainty is that current federal education law, as it stands, has neither served us well nor protected children from the harmful effects of politics - gone - wrong.

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) has now replaced No Child Left Behind as the current version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), our flagship federal education legislation, opening the door for states and districts to do better, but we still have a long way to go.

The current list is based on standardized testing data from the era of No Child Left Behind, a federal law that graded schools heavily on math and reading scores.

It's hard to believe any future federal secretary of education will have the opportunity to abuse his power in the way the current one has; and better solutions may arise locally, particularly if legislators are willing to learn about practices already proved effective overseas, rather than experimenting ceaselessly on the unsuspecting children trapped in California's declining state schools.

When President George W. Bush signed the current version, No Child Left Behind, in 2002, it expanded federal involvement and penalized schools that it labeled as «failing.»

Shouldn't federal and state government provide those same rights to children from low - income families, to students of color, and to others shortchanged by our current system?

Ignoring decades of research on engaging, challenging learning environments, the strategies for school improvement mandated under current federal law show little promise of helping children learn.

But the current No Child left behind negotiations seem to align with the federal government's view that high - stakes tests do not cause or encourage cheating.

Several points that I felt were imperative: 1) Everyone at the federal level knows that the current law is disliked and must change, 2) There is a recognized effort to make the language and details of the next ESEA reauthorization more user - friendly — all stakeholders of a school community should be able to understand the legislation and be vested in the success of schools, and 3) Legislators are seeking the right balance between formula funding and competitive grants — one area of consideration is the consolidation of educational programs or initiatives, which will allow federal monies to be used more effectively to help schools and children.

Gubera says with the current No Child Left Behind act rapidly going out of style, there's little need to attach the state's letter grade to the federal law.

In the current rapidly changing state and federal accountability landscape where the criteria assessing school performance is in transition, we know student learning remains the most important factor during charter renewal, and for parents and families deciding on the school that best meets the needs of their child.

The federal government pays a subsidy for each child that is a beneficiary of an RESP from the day the child is born until his / her 17th birthday.30 The current annual maximum CESG per beneficiary is $ 500 (i.e., 20 % of the first $ 2,500 of contributions paid annually).

Canada's current tax rate structure means that a couple with two children in which spouses report a taxable income of $ 60,000 and $ 20,000, respectively, would pay about $ 1,210 more in federal income taxes in 2014 than a couple with two children in which both spouses report a taxable income of $ 40,000, even though their combined household income is the same at $ 80,000.

Include a current or former federal judge or state judge or a spouse of a current or former federal judge or state judge or a current or former district attorney, criminal district attorney, or county attorney whose jurisdiction includes any criminal law or child protective services matter, as persons whose information is excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021 (Availability of Public Information) if it is information that relates to certain personal information.

The federal budget for low - income housing assistance has been targeted for reduction.25, 26 From a public health perspective, the findings of the current study raise concerns about the impact on child well - being of these proposed reductions.

The project will build on current state efforts and partnerships to improve the developmental health of young children and family well - being in high - need neighborhoods through Florida MIECHV, Florida Help Me Grow, local Early Learning Coalitions and Early Head Start, Title V, federal and state Healthy Start, community residents and funders.

Were the Federal Government to consult and work more closely with Indigenous community groups (instead of the «dismal disregard» which was the current status quo), Tauli - Corpuz said it could achieve significant progress, on fronts including public health, housing, education, child protection, conservation and justice.

While there is certainly room for better coordination across programs, and potentially even opportunities for streamlining, the fact is that current federal investments are insufficient to reach a sizable portion of low - income children.

Post-Adoption Services: Meeting the Mental Health Needs of Children Adopted from Foster Care (PDF - 159 KB) North American Council on Adoptable Children (2007) Explains current Federal funding for postadoption services and makes recommendations for improving mental health outcomes for children by increasing funding and aligning funding witChildren Adopted from Foster Care (PDF - 159 KB) North American Council on Adoptable Children (2007) Explains current Federal funding for postadoption services and makes recommendations for improving mental health outcomes for children by increasing funding and aligning funding witChildren (2007) Explains current Federal funding for postadoption services and makes recommendations for improving mental health outcomes for children by increasing funding and aligning funding witchildren by increasing funding and aligning funding with needs.

Given the limited scope of current federal funding, 20 states are now taking action to expand and enhance Early Head Start services to young children and their families.

Speakers at the summit, which will be held at the Omni Shoreham Hotel, include keynote speaker John E. Pepper, Jr., retired Chairman and CEO of The Procter & Gamble Company and current chairman of the board of the Walt Disney Company; Judith Van Ginkel, Every Child Succeeds; Libby Doggett, Pew Center on the States; Frank Putnam, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; David Olds, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; and Deborah Daro, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago; Federal officials scheduled to speak include: Martha Coven, Special Assistant to the President, White House Domestic Policy Council; Joan Lombardi, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; and Robert Gordon, Associate Director for Education, Income Maintenance and Labor, Office of Management and Budget.

The term «fatherless» («fatherlessness») is used in this series as it is in current research and policy rhetoric by the U.S. federal government, DHHS and the National Fatherhood Initiative, most U.S. states in connection with child custody law and policy, and various family values and fatherhood interest policy and lobbying groups.

The HHS instructions, which were published this year in the Federal Register, instruct caseworkers to, «Indicate whether the child experienced prior legal adoption (s) before the current out - of - home care episode.»

Current child care assistance programs fail to reach all families that need support, with only 1 in 6 eligible families served by the federal Child Care Development Block Grant.6 Congress recently approved a $ 6 billion increase in federal child care assistance, but many eligible families still will not receive child care assistchild care assistance programs fail to reach all families that need support, with only 1 in 6 eligible families served by the federal Child Care Development Block Grant.6 Congress recently approved a $ 6 billion increase in federal child care assistance, but many eligible families still will not receive child care assistChild Care Development Block Grant.6 Congress recently approved a $ 6 billion increase in federal child care assistance, but many eligible families still will not receive child care assistchild care assistance, but many eligible families still will not receive child care assistchild care assistance.