But no one was able to predict
the current flat temperature regime, which has lasted an unexpectewd eighteen + years.
This variation plus a constant.5 deg / century trend accounts for all of the observed trend since 1850, the increase in slope during the 80s and 90s and
the current flat temperature trend.
Not exact matches
Florrie - And one or two posters have made the argument that when you remove «known» natural forcings, in the
current 10 + years of
flat temperatures, the residual anthro effect is still seen to be upwards.
Given all of this, I suspect that the
current permafrost melting in Fairbanks despite the local
temperature having been pretty
flat since 1977 is simply a result of the PDO - related warming having persisted long enough to do the job.
Whether or not the
current flat global tropospheric
temperature trend turns to cooling or back to warming will most likely depend on what the sun does next.
The same for the period 2000 -
current, where the
temperature is essentially
flat, but the CO2 levels increase faster and faster...
In other words, this prediction would seem reasonable if the nature of nature was linear and not Extremistan and we could count on a predictable continuation of the
current flat -
temperature period.
Finally onto point # 2 from above, not only can one adapt to a change similar to 1920's - > 1930's natural change over a ten year time span, we can also succesfully hold down
temperatures with aerosols (if you're skeptical of this, you can't blame the
current flat line on China's coal then, because we can surely do aerosols better when they are a deliberate end, rather than as an unintended by - product.)
The fascination of fake - skeptics with the troposphere comes from the
current flat (at record high levels) of tropospheric
temperatures.
Insisting on analysis broken out by Gregorian calendar decades allows you to discard the last three years of the
current 17 year long
flat trend, and it also allows you to lump the first four years of that trend in with six prior years that you freely admit lie on the other side of a discontinuity in the
temperature record.
We tested the actual charge times as well as the dynamic
current and battery
temperature, and actually found the USB - PD solution in the Pixel XL to fall
flat in every way (we'll have an extensive comparison on this very shortly)-- the device got warmer and it ultimately charged slower than Quick Charge 3.0, Huawei's SuperCharge and OnePlus» Dash Charge.