Not exact matches
«The
research shows that climate sensitivity was higher during the past
global,
warm climate than in the
current climate.
New
research shows that the
current drought plaguing the American West is likely the beginning of a new trend brought on by
global warming.
But in the journal Science on Thursday, Andrew Weaver of the University of Victoria in British Columbia, Canada, surveys the
current research and concludes «it is safe to say that
global warming will not lead to the onset of a new ice age».
«Our
research indicates that as
global warming continues, parts of East Antarctica will also be affected by these wind - induced changes in ocean
currents and temperatures,» Dr Jourdain said.
Our
current research in this area focuses on understanding the paleoenvironmental implications of a radical change in sedimentary iron biogeochemistry in the mid-Atlantic U.S. during the Paleocene - Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), a severe
global warming event that occurred 55 million years ago.
First, thanks to everyone at realclimate for all their excellent work; this website goes a long way to help negate the impact of the mostly fossil fuel funded denier charade, and is especially useful for the interested layperson to stay abreast of
current research on
global warming.
Apparently the
current belief (discussed starting on page 18, and like most such statements accompanied by a caveat that much more
research is needed) is that the PDO itself is closely linked to
global warming, which is to say we can expect it to spend a lot more time in the positive phase as
global warming progresses.
Studies at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System
Research reveal: solar activity affects the climate but plays only a minor role in the
current global warming
I have NO IDEA where either of these students stands on the issue of attribution of
global warming (note the complexities of attribution are nicely summarized in a
current post over at RC); none of us conducts specific
research in that area and that is not what we talk about.
Current work1 has provided evidence of the increase in frequency and intensity of winter storms, with the storm tracks shifting poleward, 2,3 but some areas have experienced a decrease in winter storm frequency.4 Although there are some indications of increased blocking (a large - scale pressure pattern with little or no movement) of the wintertime circulation of the Northern Hemisphere, 5 the assessment and attribution of trends in blocking remain an active
research area.6 Some recent
research has provided insight into the connection of
global warming to tornadoes and severe thunderstorms.7, 8
They also found that, consistent with my team's
research, about 30 % of overall
global warming has gone into the deep oceans below 700 meters due to changing wind patterns and ocean
currents.
If
current trends in
global warming continue unmitigated, some of the world's most well - known and historically significant cultural landmarks — including the Statue of Liberty in New York City, the Tower of London in the United Kingdom, and the archaeological sites of Pompeii in Italy — could be destroyed by rising
global sea levels over the next 2,000 years, according to new
research.
Organisations who deny or reject
current science on human - caused climate change, such as the
Global Warming Policy Foundation in the UK and the Heartland Institute in the US, have published critical reports, and the Republican Party organised congressional testimony against the consensus
research on Capitol Hill.
The
current global warming industry generates billions of dollars annually for
research, which helps to explain why 36 percent consider climate scientists»
research findings as being influenced by a desire to «advance their careers.»
The IPCC 95 % confidence that humans are responsible for most of the
current global warming is simply a summary of the peer - reviewed scientific
research.
In no way can my summary of the
research regarding the impact of regional climate change on the Viking civilization and Europe during the Little Ice Age be used to «prove» the
current global warming is due to a natural cycle.»
(IF MEMORY SERVES, THE
RESEARCH ACTUALLY SUGGESTS THAT THE CHANGES IN OCEAN
CURRENTS ARE, ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY RELATED TO
GLOBAL WARMING.)
leading scientist has hit out at misleading newspaper reports that linked his
research to claims that the
current cold weather undermines the scientific case for manmade
global warming.
Two studies in the
current edition of the journal «Nature» show that
global warming is already posing a threat to a variety of plants and animals, and other
research suggests that the sea ice around the Earth's poles could melt entirely by the end of this century.
The most
current research shows that aerosols do temporarily cool the planet, masking the ongoing effects of
global warming.
But now new
research shows that ocean
currents may be hindering these critical methane - eating bacteria, thus contributing to
global warming.
James Hansen and the
global warming zealots are having their funds shut down due to the promotion of intentional fallacious
research and the blatant omission of
current empirical data highlighting solar and other influence.
The third one — essentially looking at the impact of
global warming on the probability of extreme events such as this flood — is part of
current climate
research.
The new
research worries scientists because of the huge impact
global warming has already had on the
currents and the unpredictability of a future «tipping point».
Given the stakes in the
current debate over
global warming, the
research may very well turn out to be one of the most important climate experiments of our time — if only the media would report the story.