Sentences with phrase «current hiatus in warming»

This, of course, is because they are merely incrementing machines, reading the inputs (forcings) and doing a linear transform with a lag... and as a result, none of them predicted the current hiatus in the warming.

The paper being discussed here makes the claim that the current hiatus in warming is due to the heat going into the Atlantic ocean as the Atlantic ocean is currently in the 30 year cooling phase of it's ~ 60 year warming / cooling cycle.

CMIP5 models also fail to explain the current hiatus in warming even including natural variation.

Not exact matches

A favourite climate contrarian talking point is that there was a pause or «hiatus» in warming from 1998 until the early part of the current decade.

There is little room left for anthropogenic warming of other than minor significance The current hiatus represents a peak in both the 60 and 960 + / - periodicities, The linked post also forecasts the timing and amplitude of a possible coming cooling.

They relate the current hiatus period at the surface and a deeper penetration of the warming into the ocean with changes in the trade winds on the subtropical Pacific (intensification).

The warm sea surface temperatures in the gyres, during hiatus decades, indicate convergence of near - surface currents and strong downwelling of heat.

My personal choice would have included drawing the connection between the current hiatus and the one in the eighties and nineties but that would have necessitated exposing the fake warming of the eighties and nineties which they would do everything to hide.

I disagree that the stadium wave can explain the current cessation of warming, aka «hiatus» in IPCC jargon.

The IPO is also thought to influence global temperature, as the current hiatus in global warming has been related to the late 1990's phase change [Meehl et al., 2013; England et al., 2014].

These include claiming that addressing climate change will keep the poor in «energy poverty»; citing the global warming «hiatus» or «pause» to dismiss concerns about climate change; pointing to changes in the climate hundreds or thousands of years ago to deny that the current warming is caused by humans; alleging that unmitigated climate change will be a good thing; disputing that climate change is accelerating sea level rise; and denying that climate change is making weather disasters more costly.

If the previous models are unskilled at predicting the current hiatus in surface warming and this is really because the warming has gone into the oceans then exactly how long will this take to come back and bite us in the bum?

One of the principal issues is the cause of the hiatus in the current global warming trend.»

So the current hiatus in surface warming is a transient and global warming has not gone away: there is a continuing radiative imbalance at the top of atmosphere.

The current hiatus is not the only rime in history when warming stood still.

But neither approach evaluates whether the current understanding of the relationship among radiative forcing, internal variability, and global surface temperature can account for the timing and magnitude of the 1999 — 2008 hiatus in warming.

There is no room left for anthropogenic warming of other than minor significance The current hiatus represents a peak in both the 60 and 960 + / - periodicities, The linked post also forecasts the timing amplitude of a possible coming cooling.

What do you call the mental process which allows a man to say «What's firmly established is that the climate is warming» while also holding that «There's been a burst of worthy research aimed at figuring out what causes the stutter - steps in the process — including the current hiatus / pause / plateau [in warming] ``?