This work argues the importance of the noncognitive for student life outcomes, reviews the little we know about how to improve student academic perseverance and mindset, and raises questions about our nation's
current measures of teacher effectiveness.
Not exact matches
There are a number
of reasons: 1) student achievement probably wasn't used as the
measure of teacher effectiveness; 2) before the advent
of the modern computer, in the mid-1960s, some
of the more sophisticated analyses were not feasible; 3) the structure and makeup
of schools change, making the findings less applicable to the
current situation; 4) most important, older studies may not control for critical variables, such as students» backgrounds or past achievement.
Value - added
measures have caught the interest
of policymakers because, unlike many
of the uses
of test scores in
current accountability systems, it purports to «level the playing field» so that value - added
measures of teachers»
effectiveness do not depend on characteristics
of the students.
Finally, we consider how the
current body
of knowledge, and the gaps in that knowledge, can guide decisions about how to use value - added
measures in evaluations
of teacher effectiveness.
Do you think
current assessments do a good job
of measuring teacher effectiveness?
Changing the
current evaluation system to focus on improved student outcomes, including objective
measures of student growth, is critical to improving
teacher effectiveness, raising student achievement, and meeting the objectives
of the federal «No Child Left Behind Act
of 2001.»
Tennessee's new multiple -
measures teacher and principal
effectiveness evaluation system will enhance our
current ability to identify performance levels
of educators and be a much more strategic tool for supporting them.
Also recall that one
of the key reports that triggered the
current call for VAMs, as the «more objective»
measures needed to
measure and therefore improve
teacher effectiveness, was based on data that suggested that «too many
teachers» were being rated as satisfactory or above.
Standardized tests are being used to
measure things they can not
measure, like school quality and
teacher effectiveness, with deleterious results; such as massive school closures, which destabilize children and communities, and the
current troubling shortage
of students willing to enter the teaching profession.
In a recent post, I wrote that Randi Weingarten, the
current president
of the American Federation
of Teachers (AFT), has (finally) expressed her full opposition against the use
of value - added models (VAMs) to evaluate and
measure teacher effectiveness.
This chapter examines the makeup
of the
current teacher workforce in the United States, exploring trends and changes over time and what is known about how some
of these demographic factors relate to
measures of effectiveness.