The book includes the following papers: (1) «The
Middle School: Mimicking the Success Routes of the Information Age» (Thomas O. Erb) which reviews the historical issues surrounding gifted education and middle - level education; (2) «Middle Schools and Their Impact on Talent Development» (Mary Ruth Coleman and James J. Gallagher) which describes two studies, one which compared attitudes of middle school and gifted educators and the other which looked at current best practices; (3) «Gifted Learners and the Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
Middle School: Mimicking the Success Routes of the Information Age» (Thomas O. Erb) which reviews the historical issues surrounding gifted education and middle - level education; (2) «Middle Schools and Their Impact on Talent Development» (Mary Ruth Coleman and James J. Gallagher) which describes two studies, one which compared attitudes of middle school and gifted educators and the other which looked at current best practices; (3) «Gifted Learners and the Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
School: Mimicking the Success Routes of the Information Age» (Thomas O. Erb) which reviews the historical issues surrounding gifted education and
middle - level education; (2) «Middle Schools and Their Impact on Talent Development» (Mary Ruth Coleman and James J. Gallagher) which describes two studies, one which compared attitudes of middle school and gifted educators and the other which looked at current best practices; (3) «Gifted Learners and the Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
middle - level education; (2) «
Middle Schools and Their Impact on Talent Development» (Mary Ruth Coleman and James J. Gallagher) which describes two studies, one which compared attitudes of middle school and gifted educators and the other which looked at current best practices; (3) «Gifted Learners and the Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
Middle Schools and Their Impact on Talent Development» (Mary Ruth Coleman and James J. Gallagher) which describes two studies, one which compared attitudes of
middle school and gifted educators and the other which looked at current best practices; (3) «Gifted Learners and the Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
middle school and gifted educators and the other which looked at current best practices; (3) «Gifted Learners and the Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
school and gifted
educators and the other which looked at
current best practices; (3) «Gifted Learners and the
Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
Middle School: Problem or Promise?&
School: Problem or Promise?»
Numerous provisions contained in S. 1177 represent a huge step forward from
current legislation: the elimination of adequate yearly progress and the 100 percent proficiency requirements, tempering the test - and - punish provisions of No Child Left Behind; the continued requirement of disaggregated subgroup data; removal of the unworkable
school turnaround models required under the School Improvement Grant and Race to the Top programs; clarification of the term school leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school turnaround models required under the
School Improvement Grant and Race to the Top programs; clarification of the term school leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
School Improvement Grant and Race to the Top programs; clarification of the term
school leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school leader as the principal of an elementary,
middle or high
school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «
School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
School Leadership Residency Program»; activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and
school leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school leaders in high - need
schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve
school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effe
school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other
educators who are experienced and effective.