This change would make transactions appear smaller to
current nodes on the network, so that more could be included in a bitcoin block, even if blocks are still limited to 1 MB by protocol rules.
Not exact matches
In order to fuel your token you will have to pay gas, and those costs will depend
on how many tokens you are selling and the
current price of gas; this fee goes to the
nodes that are maintaining the
network.
That's because ethereum depends
on a
network of «
nodes», each of which stores the entire ethereum transaction history and the
current «state» of account balances, contracts and storage.
In the
current systems, a secret message must essentially be unscrambled and rescrambled at each
node on a
network, which are then potentially vulnerable to attack.
That's because ethereum depends
on a
network of «
nodes», each of which stores the entire ethereum transaction history and the
current «state» of account balances, contracts and storage.
Given that miners can now set up a
node much more quickly with the updated client, it could allow for increased short term capacity
on the
network at
current transaction rates.
As an oversimplification of the
current debate: Some would like to see an increase in block size which would enable more
on - chain transactions per second; others would like to see the block size limit remain low in an effort to limit the cost of operating a full
node while moving some types of payments above the base Bitcoin protocol to secondary layers such as the Lightning
Network and sidechains.
Ethereum's
current ability to scale, «Scalability [currently] sucks; the blockchain design fundamentally relies
on bottlenecks where individual
nodes must process every single transaction in the entire
network.»
Other features include time synchronization between
network nodes, encrypted messaging, and the option to build additional layers of security and protection
on top of the
current NEM infrastructure.