Not exact matches
As long as
nuclear technology remains important for keeping America in its
current position of global leadership, the U.S. government will keep pumping research's life - blood (money) into
nuclear -
energy - related science.
-- From the Summer 2001 Edition of University
Currents, a publication of DOE's Office of
Nuclear Energy, Science and
Technology.
They all expect that somehow the
technologies (whatever they are) will magically thwart the Second Law; that we will somehow replace tit - for - tat the
current energy flow from fossil fuel with sunlight or
nuclear or geothermal, you name it.
Current technology includes
nuclear fission, which is more than capable of dealing with global
energy needs, and at costs lower than fossil — IF it were only deployed.
Even so, if you weigh the risks (fully considered and in the light of
current technology as well as developing
technology) against the benefits,
nuclear is by far and away the best, cheapest and safest form of
energy production.
Seems to me,
nuclear power in it's
current form, is a mature
technology that is being overtaken by more advanced
energy forms that are more efficient and cost effective.
Just to keep the costs in perspective with alternatives here are the alternatives again: —
Current EU carbon price = $ 10 / t CO2 — Estimated abatement cost with renewable
energy in Australia = $ 300 / t CO2 [3]-- Estimated abatement cost with
nuclear energy in Australia = $ 65 / t CO2 — Nordhaus «Low - cost backstop»
technology (assumes) = $ 270 / t CO2 [4]-- CO2 Abatement cost if / when we allow low - cost
nuclear = < $ 0 / t CO2 [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
They believe the transition to a wind & solar powered
energy grid could be made in two decades or less using
current technology, and at an affordable cost — but only if the many roadblocks now being thrown up by
nuclear and fossil fuel interests can be overcome.
Increasingly, analysts describe
current designs as «bridging
technologies,» stepping stones toward more advanced clean
energy, whether in the form of perovskite solar cells or modular
nuclear reactors.
A 100 % renewable
energy transition globally by 2050 is both technological possible and will reduce the average cost of energy by 30 % from current fossil fuel and nuclear power prices according to a comprehensive 2017 study of the European Energy Watch Group led by physicist and German PV pioneer Hans - Josef Fell and performed by Berlin's Lappeenranta University of Techn
energy transition globally by 2050 is both technological possible and will reduce the average cost of
energy by 30 % from current fossil fuel and nuclear power prices according to a comprehensive 2017 study of the European Energy Watch Group led by physicist and German PV pioneer Hans - Josef Fell and performed by Berlin's Lappeenranta University of Techn
energy by 30 % from
current fossil fuel and
nuclear power prices according to a comprehensive 2017 study of the European
Energy Watch Group led by physicist and German PV pioneer Hans - Josef Fell and performed by Berlin's Lappeenranta University of Techn
Energy Watch Group led by physicist and German PV pioneer Hans - Josef Fell and performed by Berlin's Lappeenranta University of
Technology.
Fixing the problems of the
current DOE loan guarantee program and ensuring that we have an effective financing authority for a broad range of clean
energy technologies, including renewables,
nuclear,
energy efficiency, and carbon capture and storage, needs to be one of our highest priorities.
Clean
Energy Technologies Can Return CO2 to Safe Levels This Century Though current atmospheric carbon dioxide levels of about 385 parts per million are already above the revised safe level of 350ppm being promoted by scientists, Kharecha said that it is still possible to return them to safe levels by the end of this century if we engage in «Herculean» efforts to shift towards renewable energy sources, increase the use of nuclear power, and apply carbon sequestration technologies on existing coal power p
Energy Technologies Can Return CO2 to Safe Levels This Century Though
current atmospheric carbon dioxide levels of about 385 parts per million are already above the revised safe level of 350ppm being promoted by scientists, Kharecha said that it is still possible to return them to safe levels by the end of this century if we engage in «Herculean» efforts to shift towards renewable
energy sources, increase the use of nuclear power, and apply carbon sequestration technologies on existing coal power p
energy sources, increase the use of
nuclear power, and apply carbon sequestration
technologies on existing coal power plants.
Their
current 5 - year plan is full of action to develop knowledge and products that are based on the view that there will be a huge global market demand for new
energy technology, rail transport, ice breaking ships,
nuclear power, etc..
Many new
technologies could change the whole picture such as massive
energy storage, efficient electro - catalytic hydrogen production, ambient temperature superconductors etc. but with the
current technology investing in wind / solar over
nuclear will aggravate our GHG emission problems not improve them.