The current nuclear waste that we have sitting at the bottom of spent fuel pools and in dry cask storage would be more than enough to fuel the first reactors.
On top of that at least some of
the current nuclear waste we have could be used as fuel for these reactors, this making our current waste problem less of an issue.
Not exact matches
In particular, a relatively new form of
nuclear technology could overcome the principal drawbacks of
current methods — namely, worries about reactor accidents, the potential for diversion of
nuclear fuel into highly destructive weapons, the management of dangerous, long - lived radioactive
waste, and the depletion of global reserves of economically available uranium.
Although some have argued that
current methods of managing
nuclear waste present problems, I would affirm that safe, effective management of used fuel and other radioactive material have been consistently demonstrated over several decades.
He said the research could also inform ways to produce glass suitable for storing
nuclear waste more effectively than
current practices.
We should ensure that any
nuclear new - build and
waste storage facilities are located at least 80 metres above
current sea level.
And modern
nuclear technology can reduce proliferation risks and solve the
waste disposal problem by burning
current waste and using fuel more efficiently.
The
waste stream from
nuclear is small and well within our
current technological capabilities to safely handle.
One of the more entertaining
current doublethinks from the greenie moonbats is their total acceptance of sequestration of a gazillion cubic meters of CO2, yet total horror at a few cubic meters of
nuclear waste.
While this is more expensive than the
current cost of market power at $ 32 / MWh, solar has no fuel costs, no risk of fuel cost increases, and no water or air pollution, coal ash clean - up, or
nuclear waste costs.
In particular, advanced reactor design involves «eating»
nuclear waste from
current fission reactors, thus strongly reducing
nuclear waste and proliferation problems.
Given the evident concern about
nuclear waste, it will be interesting to see if there is any reactions from young people to the governments recent admission that, on
current NDA plans, the proposed Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) is not expected to be available to take spent fuel from new
nuclear power stations until around 2130, which they note «is approximately 50 years after the likely end of electricity generation for the first new
nuclear power station».
In addition, the
nuclear advocates all talk about the next generation of
nuclear power that would not only use a fraction of
current uranium consumption per kWh but may also be able to extract power from the
nuclear waste that has been produced to date.
Here the letter conflates the issue of opposition to the
current crop of
nuclear power plants — which are simply uncompetitive quite separate from the very legitimate issues of safety,
waste disposal, proliferation, and water consumption — with a supposed lack of support for next generation
nuclear power plants (that will be magically cheaper, despite all trend data to the contrary).