Sentences with phrase «current parenting arrangements»

Current parenting arrangements were relatively similar for both groups with almost 40 per cent in each group reporting that the subject children lived with them.

The percentage of parents satisfied with the current parenting arrangements for their children rose from 15 % before attending Parenting Apart to 41 % three months after.

Information on your children including a summary of your current parenting arrangements and a list of any additional expenditure relating to your child or children, for example, dental treatment, orthotics, private school fees, music lessons etc..

Not exact matches

Parents whose current child custody arrangement no longer works for them may need to request a child custody modification in court.

So, whenever I answer parents» questions about sleep, I first ask this: are you okay with your current sleeping arrangement and is the sleeping area safe?

The current arrangements, brought in by Labour in 1999, enable affected parents to scrap selection in local grammar schools but only after a complex ballot process.

Critics have carped that the Bloomberg - led system fails to give parents sufficient voice — whatever that means — but the current arrangement is a night - and - day improvement over the old Board of Education, which was not only less accountable to the public, but failed at its most basic mission: improving our schools and teaching our kids.

In my opinion, your parents basically have two options: move to a fee - based arrangement either with their current adviser, or with a new one.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.

A «move - away «case arises when a parent that has joint or sole custody of the child decides to move to a location that is far enough away to disrupt the current custodial arrangement.

For example, the courts view a current satisfactory living arrangement for a child or children of divorcing parents as «all important.»

Your current custody arrangements were created by a custody decree, residential schedule or parenting plan issued by a court.

Before requesting a court - ordered modification to change a custody arrangement, each parent should understand the custody terms in the current order for custody.

The right is structured so that it is functional and flexible, and it will not place the current residential parent under a scheduling burden that will effectively prevent that parent from engaging in spontaneous last - minute arrangements and activities under threat of facing possible litigation allegations of noncompliance or noncooperation.

Sometimes, divorced parents want to modify a custody arrangement because the current routine no longer works for either or both of them.

(c) the parents» current and future capacity to communicate with each other and resolve difficulties that might arise in implementing an arrangement of that kind; and

(b) the parents» current and future capacity to implement an arrangement for the child spending equal time, or substantial and significant time, with each of the parents; and

If you feel that the current contact arrangement with parents is causing problems for you or the child, talk to your child protection agency or lawyer about making changes.

If an existing parenting order no longer reflects current arrangements for a child or the other party can not reasonably comply you can ask the court to make an order to vary the existing order.

Regarding the well being of kids with divorced parents, the debate over what kind of custody arrangement is best rages on, but the Swedish study goes against some current thinking that kids in shared - custody routines are exposed to more stress due to constantly moving back and forth and the social disruption that can come along with it.

Both forms require information about your child's current living arrangement and basic information about both parents.

The current funding program entitled the «supporting families fund» has two objectives: one, to contribute to the continued improvement to access to the family justice system; and two, to encourage greater parental compliance with family obligations, notably support and parenting arrangements.

Parents whose current child custody arrangement no longer works for them may need to request a child custody modification in court.

Generally, those factors include the parents» wishes and ability to provide for the child, in addition to the current child custody arrangement and the child's existing relationship with each parent.

In this proceeding, a court will either alter the child custody arrangement, in favor of the non-custodial parent or a court may leave the current custodial agreement intact.

These factors include how dependant the child's sense of stability is upon the current custodial / time sharing arrangement, how far away the relocation destination is from the non-custodial parent, the age of the child or children, the relationship between the child and both parents, the relationship between the parents and whether they are capable of facilitating a continued relationship between the child and the non-custodial parent from a distance, the child's wishes if she is appropriately mature, and the reason for the relocation.

«Due to the current practice in the D.C. Superior Court to approve voluntary joint custody arrangements, the absence of a joint custody statute in the District of Columbia tends to cause difficulty only in those situations where the parents do not agree to a joint custody arrangement.»

The resources look at the different kinds of rainbow and same - sex parenting and family arrangements, the current research on outcomes for children, and the unique challenges that same - sex families face.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary

Michigan law provides that a parent who is subject to a joint child custody arrangement may not move more than 100 miles from his or her current home without the consent of the other parent or the approval of the court.

Either parent can request a modification to the current arrangement.

The proposed time - sharing changes could potentially upend the state's current policy of putting the needs of children first in favor of parents» wishes when judges determine custody arrangements, Scott wrote in Friday's veto letter.

I have found that over my many years in family law practice that the trend has gone from moms having the majority of the parenting time awarded to them to the current arrangement where most cases end up in a shared custodial and parenting time arrangement that is often 50/50 between moms and dads or very close to it.