Jessica Tang, President of the Boston Teacher's Union, said the bill's supporters believe in high standards and accountability, but
the current standardized testing system is not working.
Not exact matches
Under the
current teacher and principal evaluation
system, students» growth scores — a state - produced calculation that quantifies students» year - to - year improvement on
standardized tests while controlling for factors like poverty — make up 20 percent of evaluations for teachers whose courses culminate in the state
tests.
A True TestWhat is a true measure of our students success?In this world of
standardized testing ~ does our
current system of evaluation in education...
There is broad agreement that states»
current accountability
systems are overly dependent on
standardized tests that do not (and can not) capture all the skills that students need to acquire, and that have sometimes encouraged teachers to engage in harmful curriculum narrowing and «
test prep.»
Taken together, we believe we have spelled out an approach to
standardized testing grounded in the fact that assessments can gather critical information about our students» growth and our own teaching practice, while acknowledging that this potential will be lost if we ignore the need for improvements to our
current system.
In this world of
standardized testing ~ does our
current system of evaluation in education mirror the real world ~ where students will spend the rest of their lives working and striving for success?
The new
system, which requires
test - takers to sit at computer terminals and answer questions electronically, is likely to revolutionize the whole
standardized -
testing field, making
current paper - and - pencil methods obsolete, those working on the idea believe.
And that will be easier to recognize than under the
current system, which is haphazard evaluation, or under a
system which gives an inordinate amount of emphasis to the
standardized tests, which is clearly an inaccurate measure.
And while Florida's
current A-F school grading
system tries to adjust for the fact that schools in high poverty areas face challenges that make it very hard for their students to perform well on
standardized tests, it's not enough, says Alan Ehrenhalt for Governing Magazine.
The consortium intends to use the eventual
system to press the state to change the
current high stakes
standardized tests to a
system that actually benefits the learning of our growing diversity of learners.
And it would be most unfortunate if attempts to improve teacher accountability exacerbated one of the most criticized aspects of
current accountability
systems, namely the overreliance on
standardized tests.
The problem with most
current systems is they measure growth by using
standardized test scores in a few academic subjects, usually math and reading, which are not a very accurate or comprehensive way to check on overall student progress.
Overall, as Barbara Madeloni, President of the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA), put it, while the
current system is not working, Bills S. 308, H. 2860 and H. 2844 would provide a «blueprint for us to think imaginatively about what we can do for our schools» without so many millions of teaching hours being devoted to
standardized testing.
The outcome of that process and of the House's parallel bill which left committee already and which failed to adopt a Democratic sponsored amendment to require states to adopt «college and career ready standards» and to use
standardized test results in accountability
systems, will play a significant role in the
current policy environment that is best summarized as «
test and punish».
Here's the Friday, January 11 letter in which LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy describes his concerns about California State Superintendent Tom Torlakson's recommendation to reduce
standardized testing: It's not that Deasy opposes all changes to the
current testing and accountability
system.