Sentences with phrase «current warming clearly»

Internal variability has always been superimposed on top of global surface temperature trends, but the magnitude - as well as the fingerprints - of current warming clearly indicates that anthropogenic greenhouse gases are the dominant factor.

Not exact matches

This is clearly the case with global warming, as the consequences of our current lifestyle are not likely to be fully realized for another 25 to 50 years.»

She also emphasises the importance of the study to current debates about a human role in climate warming: «Cumulative archaeological data clearly demonstrates that humans are more than capable of reshaping and dramatically transforming ecosystems.

The bottom line is that regardless of whether or not the D - O cycles are triggered by the Sun, the timing is clearly not right for this cycle to be responsible for the current warming.

«The current world climate report indicates clearly that net - zero emissions are a precondition for limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius.

Clearly something has been lost in translation with its current installation in a warm, bare, brightly lit gallery.

(see Part 1 of the Link) The way to go is simply to state clearly what the working hypothesis is and what are the reasonable assumptions that went into them — in my case the basic assumptions are that the current warming peak is a synchronous peak in the 60 and 960 year periodicities and that the 10Be and neutron count records are the best proxy for solar activity.

When I was at school in the fifties, the oceanic warm and cold currents were clearly marked and learnt as fact.

In the first plot, relating to ocean temperatures, it is clearly warmer about 1000 years ago but current temperatures are clearly warmer at the surface.

The physical evidence clearly shows that carbon dioxide is causing the current warming trend.

These clearly comfirms a substantial warmer MWP than current temperatures.

No good can come from increasing any pollution to no end, but there is clearly room for honest debate before we create more havoc based on the current evidence or propaganda for CO2 caused global warming.

Their two main results are a confirmation that current global surface temperatures are hotter than at any time in the past 1,400 years (the general «hockey stick» shape, as shown in Figure 1), and that while the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and Little Ice Age (LIA) are clearly visible events in their reconstruction, they were not globally synchronized events.

The way to go is simply to state clearly what the working hypothesis is and what reasonable assumptions went into them — in my case the basic assumptions are that the current warming peak is a synchronous peak in the 60 and 960 year periodicities and that the 10Be and neutron count records are the best proxy for solar activity.

3 / looking at individual weather stations, one can also observe significant and questionable adjustment evolutions: Few examples of how to hide the inconvenient truth that temperature have been warmer in the past, despite small anthropogenic signature: Station Data: Reykjavik (64.1 N, 21.9 W)-- Old adjustments: the 30's are clearly warmer than current period.

This author must admit he remains undecided — if nuclear really can help curb global warming, which is clearly our biggest current environmental crisis, he may be open to limited, and very strictly controlled, development of nuclear.

So Overpeck says terms such as MWP «should only used with care», and that it should be clearly explained that the MWP is not a «natural analog» to the «current warming period».

The bottom line is that regardless of whether or not the D - O cycles are triggered by the Sun, the timing is clearly not right for this cycle to be responsible for the current warming.