The way to go is simply to state clearly what the working hypothesis is and what reasonable assumptions went into them — in my case the basic assumptions are that
the current warming peak is a synchronous peak in the 60 and 960 year periodicities and that the 10Be and neutron count records are the best proxy for solar activity.
(see Part 1 of the Link) The way to go is simply to state clearly what the working hypothesis is and what are the reasonable assumptions that went into them — in my case the basic assumptions are that
the current warming peak is a synchronous peak in the 60 and 960 year periodicities and that the 10Be and neutron count records are the best proxy for solar activity.
Not exact matches
There is little room left for anthropogenic
warming of other than minor significance The
current hiatus represents a
peak in both the 60 and 960 + / - periodicities, The linked post also forecasts the timing and amplitude of a possible coming cooling.
Thus doubling the solar wind velocity [which is what happens during these solar wind
peaks of 500 - 1000 km / s and more increases the dynamic pressure pulse four fold, increases the electrical field - aligned
currents, which then increases ionospheric Joule heating which contribute to global
warming.
Japanese Naval Records indicate a fleet navigated a completely ice - free Arctic Ocean at the
peak of the Medieval
Warm Period, so total melting is nothing new, however unlikely at
current temperatures.
It also concludes that
current northern hemisphere surface air temperatures are significantly higher than during the
peak of the Medieval
Warm Period (MWP).
The
current El Niño — a meteorological event in which a band of
warm water develops in the Pacific Ocean around the equator — is about to
peak.
Most interesting is that the about monthly variations correlate with the lunar phases (
peak on full moon) The Helsinki Background measurements 1935 The first background measurements in history; sampling data in vertical profile every 50 - 100m up to 1,5 km; 364 ppm underthe clouds and above Haldane measurements at the Scottish coast 370 ppmCO2 in winds from the sea; 355 ppm in air from the land Wattenberg measurements in the southern Atlantic ocean 1925-1927 310 sampling stations along the latitudes of the southern Atlantic oceans and parts of the northern; measuring all oceanographic data and CO2 in air over the sea; high ocean outgassing crossing the
warm water
currents north (> ~ 360 ppm) Buchs measurements in the northern Atlantic ocean 1932 - 1936 sampling CO2 over sea surface in northern Atlantic Ocean up to the polar circle (Greenland, Iceland, Spitsbergen, Barents Sea); measuring also high CO2 near Spitsbergen (Spitsbergen
current, North Cape
current) 364 ppm and CO2 over sea crossing the Atlantic from Kopenhagen to Newyork and back (Brements on a swedish island Lundegards CO2 sampling on swedish island (Kattegatt) in summer from 1920 - 1926; rising CO2 concentration (+7 ppm) in the 20s; ~ 328 ppm yearly average
The scientists also calculate that the world's emissions of heat - trapping gases must
peak in less than 10 years and then dive quickly to nearly zero, if
warming of more than another 2 degrees Fahrenheit above the
current annual global temperature is to be prevented after 2050.
The red line indicates the
peak temperature anomaly of the past century, the blue line indicates the
current temperature anomaly, the shaded red circles indicate periods in which temperatures were
warmer than the
peak warmth of the past century, and the shaded blue circles indicate periods during the past century that were colder than present.
We know that albedo has been decreasing since the Little Ice Age into what may very well be the
peak of the
Current Warm Period.
oops, I misread the dates,
peak that was as
warm as
current period was late 18th c., not late 19th (which was close but less
warm than today.)
Per NOAA's own empirical dataset, the earlier 20th century
warming cumulative amount was actually greater than the modern era period ending in December 2015 — and remember, the December 2015 temperatures anomaly just had an incredible surge due to the
current El Niño
peak.
As in Lowe et al. [33], we find that emissions in the year 2020 are not a good indicator of
peak warming, because they are largely a function of
current emissions, and are not a key determinant of cumulative emissions.
If you look at the last 11,500 years, the
current warming is approximately «on time» (with no CO2 effect whatsoever), and the
warming peaks display a downward trend since the «Holocene Optimum».
And in a news conference here on Thursday, three panelists said the
current warming was probably, but not certainly, beyond any
peaks since the year 900.
Is the
current modern
warming a
peak and are we going to slide down the other side in the near future?
History tells us that once the
current natural cycles revert, surface
warming will jump upward, as it did at the
peak of the solar cycle and El Niño in 1998.
It was Mielser who trie to suggest the Yosemite trend was a fraud because
current temperatures have never exceeded the 20s and 30s
peak and thus no global
warming.
The research, which was published today in top geoscience journal Nature Geoscience, shows continual
warming over the past 11,000 years, contradicting the
current belief that northern hemisphere temperatures
peaked 6,000 to 8,000 years ago and cooled until the pre-Industrial period.
The
current warming period seems to have
peaked and all indicators are that another short term cooling period is in the works.
There is no room left for anthropogenic
warming of other than minor significance The
current hiatus represents a
peak in both the 60 and 960 + / - periodicities, The linked post also forecasts the timing amplitude of a possible coming cooling.
Altai Mountains, S. Siberia, Russia 2007 Kalugin, I., Daryin, A., Smolyaninova, L., Andreev, A., Diekmann, B. and Khlystov, O. mean
peak temperature of the latter part of the Medieval
Warm Period was about 0.5 °C higher than the mean
peak temperature of the
Current Warm Period.