Not exact matches
Regular followers of RealClimate will be aware of our publication in 2009 in Nature, showing that West Antarctica — the part of the Antarctic ice sheet that is
currently contributing the most
to sea level rise, and which has the potential
to become unstable and
contribute a lot more (3 meters!)
Is it too much of a stretch
to assume that
sea levels will
rise faster than
currently predicted, largely because many of the factors that
contribute to sea levels rising are occurring at faster - than - predicted, and possibly accelerating, rate?
Secondly, most of the ice that will melt and
contribute to sea -
level rise is
currently closer
to the spin axis than it would be if it were uniformly distributed across the surface of the planet... so, I am not sure it would lead
to a shortening of the LOD but I am willing
to be persuaded otherwise.
Quantitatively, Vasskog et al. estimate that during this time (the prior interglacial) the GrIS was «probably between ~ 7 and 60 % smaller than at present,» and that that melting
contributed to a
rise in global
sea level of «between 0.5 and 4.2 m.» Thus, in comparing the present interglacial
to the past interglacial, atmospheric CO2 concentrations are
currently 30 % higher, global temperatures are 1.5 - 2 °C cooler, GrIS volume is from 7 - 67 % larger, and global
sea level is at least 0.5 - 4.2 m lower, none of which observations signal catastrophe for the present.