Johnson v. Law Society of British Columbia, 2018 BCCA 40, considered provocation as a defence where a lawyer
cursed at a police officer in a courthouse.
Not exact matches
Jehovah's Witnesses instigated court decisions in 1942 which involved
cursing a
police officer calling him a fascist and to get in your face
at the door steps,... this same JW 1942 court decision upheld infamous Phelps hate church in 2011 — Danny Haszard, More on this group http://www.dannyhaszard.com
Day two would include topics surrounding interactions with the public before an arrest or force might become necessary — reminding
officers that
cursing at a cop is not a crime, that they should not use foul language, emphasizing the value of communication and other «smart
policing techniques.»
Answer: «DUI - super extreme» is the charge when a person does all of the following: hits «numerous curbs» and drives on the sidewalk; says «I don't have to walk f*cking anywhere» when approached by a cop; shoves an
officer after declining to take field sobriety tests; scuffles with a cop and gets taken to the ground; knees a second
officer in the crotch while being handcuffed; repeatedly
curses at police; kicks the inside of a squad car; has a blood alcohol content nearly three times the legal limit; and poses for a mug shot like this: