Sentences with phrase «custody arrangement serves»

In general, it is the court's view that a joint custody arrangement serves the best interests of the child.

The judge will ask a parent several questions during a child custody hearing to determine which custody arrangement serves the child's best interest.

The judge will ask a parent several questions during a child custody hearing to determine which custody arrangement serves the child's best interest.

In general, it is the court's view that a joint custody arrangement serves the best interests of the child.

Not exact matches

Family courts in New Jersey can order a custody arrangement agreed upon by both parents unless it is determined that the requested custody arrangement does not serve the child's best interests.

A South Dakota court may order or ask the parents to agree on how the following issues will be handled in a joint custody arrangement: where the child will reside and when, where he will attend school, his medical and dental care, and other responsibilities serving his best interests.

A court will usually prefer a joint custody arrangement, as it serves the best interests of the child.

Although no federal laws specifically address custody, parental responsibility, visitation or time - sharing issues in military divorces, these issues are often made more challenging because service members» obligations to their jobs require extra flexibility and creativity in creating parenting plans and time - sharing arrangements that will work for both parents as well as serve the best interests of the children.

The parents can use the form to explain a new arrangement for legal custody, physical placement or both; the circuit court must approve their agreement unless the judge believes the terms do not serve the child's best interests.

You and your spouse can negotiate any type of custody arrangement as long as your child's best interests are served.

Matters of custody can also be challenged and changed over the years, with some parents voluntarily modifying child custody arrangements and others challenging an arrangement that no longer seems to be serving the best interest of the child or children involved.

The court will choose the custody arrangement that serves the best interests of the child.

If you are unable to reach an agreement on your own, the court will step in and make the decision for you, choosing a custody arrangement that serves the best interests of your child.

Couples fighting over the custody of their children need psychologists to support their version of a custodial arrangement serving the best interests of the children.

Family courts in New Jersey can order a custody arrangement agreed upon by both parents unless it is determined that the requested custody arrangement does not serve the child's best interests.

In every divorce and child custody case, the judge will work to determine what living arrangements and visitation plans will serve the needs of the child involved best.

A South Dakota court may order or ask the parents to agree on how the following issues will be handled in a joint custody arrangement: where the child will reside and when, where he will attend school, his medical and dental care, and other responsibilities serving his best interests.

Figuring out the best custody arrangements for your children and family is best served when you don't let the legal terms confuse you.

Instead, both parents equally share the burden of proving what parenting time plan and child custody arrangements will serve the best interests of the child following a parent's relocation.

In other words, when a court issues a custody order, it typically will not order a change to the arrangement unless there's been a significant change of circumstances — a change so significant that the best interests of a child are no longer served by the existing custodial arrangement.

In contemplating a proposed joint custody order, the best interests of the child standard obliges the court to ensure that the parents have assessed all components of their joint agreement, * 803 that they are committed to making it work, that their proposal fully addresses the many contingencies, and that there is no reason to believe that the child's interests will not be served by the arrangement.

The Jaramillo court further held that once a party seeking to relocate has demonstrated that the joint custody arrangement is no longer workable, both parties share equally the burden of demonstrating with which parent the child's best interests will be served.

Recent research does not support the idea that conflict - including high legal conflict - should rule out joint physical custody as the arrangement that best serves children's interests.