Sentences with phrase «custody decisions on»

Georgia courts, like courts in all states, base custody decisions on the best interests of the child — and consider several factors to determine what is best for a child's well - being.

Like most states, the Arkansas family law statutes instruct judges to base custody decisions on the best interests of...

California courts base child custody decisions on the legal doctrine known as «the best interests of the...

Like all states, New Jersey bases custody decisions on the best interests of the children, and it may not be emotionally or psychologically healthy for them to repeatedly leave their friends and activities to spend chunks of time with a parent who lives elsewhere.

Missouri courts base child custody decisions on what is in the best interests of the children by weighing all relevant factors.

In Pennsylvania, courts must base all custody decisions on what is found to be...

All states base custody decisions on the best interest of the child, but Michigan has gone a step further.

California courts base child custody decisions on the legal doctrine known as «the best interests of the child.»

Judges base custody decisions on what is in the best interests of the child, and neither parent is preferred based on gender.

Historically, like other states, Pennsylvania based custody decisions on the best interest of the child.

Most state courts base custody decisions on the best interests of the children.

All state courts base custody decisions on the best interests of the child.

In all states, courts base custody decisions on the best interests of the child, and time with siblings is in a child's best interests.

California courts base such custody decisions on the best interests of the child.

Nearly all courts base child custody decisions on the best interests of the child standard.

All states base custody decisions on what the court feels is in the best interests of the child involved — not necessarily on what might make the parents happy — but they can define those best interests differently.

He can base his final custody decision on the referee's de novo order.

The impact of a custody decision on a child's mental and physical health is enormous.

Not exact matches

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

On many points, decisions of Islamic religious courts have the force of national law (a touchy issue when a dispute involves a Muslim and a non-Muslim, or when one spouse in an existing marriage converts to Islam and makes the other members of the family subject to Shari'a determinations on matters such as child custodyOn many points, decisions of Islamic religious courts have the force of national law (a touchy issue when a dispute involves a Muslim and a non-Muslim, or when one spouse in an existing marriage converts to Islam and makes the other members of the family subject to Shari'a determinations on matters such as child custodyon matters such as child custody).

We appreciate your decision to give us feedback on suspected misuse of the Rainforest Alliance Certified ™ seal or other trademarks, non-compliance with Chain of Custody, or non-compliance with traceability or other policies.

Legal custody refers to the ability to make decisions on behalf of your child, whereas physical custody refers to where the child lives.

Physical custody relates to which parent the child lives with, while legal custody involves making major decisions on behalf of the child.

However, if parents are unable to reach a decision, the court will determine child custody based on the best interests of the child.

Because legal decisions will be made jointly, parents who win joint legal custody need to discuss important issues affecting their child's well - being on a regular basis.

In all instances, the judge will make the final decision on child support, as well as custody.

In other words, parents who share joint custody may only share joint legal custody, meaning that they equally share the responsibility for making major legal decisions on behalf of the child.

Legal custody refers to the legal authority to make major decisions on behalf of your child.

Legal custody refers to your right to make day - to - day decisions on behalf of your child, including decisions about medical care, education, and religion.

While Iowa custody laws specify that the courts must make decisions based on the best interests of the child, the legal terminology they use can be confusing.

This means that they make custody decisions based on what is best for the child's well - being in the long term.

Most custody decisions are made based on the child's wishes when a child is mature enough to express his feelings.

The court primarily considers the best interests of the child when making custody decisions, and the state has gone on record that it believes joint custody is in a child's best interests.

But, unlike divorcing couples, unmarried parents will not need to resolve any potentially complicated (and contentious) divorce - related issues such as division of property and payment of spousal support, so the decision - making process is focused almost exclusively on child custody.

Legal custody refers to the right to make important decisions on your child's behalf, including those related to health care, religion, and education.

When they are unable to reach a decision, however, or when unmarried parents are unable to agree on who will have custody of their child, the court may intervene and make a decision based on the child's best interests.

When parents can not agree on a custody arrangement, the court is left with a tough decision.

If a parent has legal custody of her child, it means she has the court - granted right to make important, long - term life decisions on behalf of the child.

Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters.

After the court makes a decision about legal custody, the court will decide on the physical care arrangement.

The Post has previously reported on Sattler's controversial decision — in the custody case of Manuel Mehos versus Lisa Mehos — to allow evidence about the woman's post divorce abortion.

With two vacancies on the state's highest court, Glick said an LGBT person would bring life experiences that would provide greater diversity in decisions related to such issues as adoption, child custody and divorce.

Haney - Caron and Heilbrun reviewed the current law relating to gay and lesbian parents and child custody decisions as well as the research on gay and lesbian parenting.

While it is premature to speculate on the implications of this work for decision - making regarding child custody, the work is valuable as it suggests that «something as basic as the amount of time that one spends with a parent or one's living arrangements» can shape the quality of child - parent relationships, write Fraley and Heffernan.

Secondhand smoke, also called environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), can have an adverse impact on child - custody decisions.

Child custody decisions in the United States are always made based on an analysis of the «best interests of the child.»

The shares, which jumped a record 43 % on the day Gross announced his decision, have climbed 23 % this year, compared with 6.1 % for the 18 - company Standard & Poor's Index of asset managers and custody banks.

In Oregon, family courts make decisions on custody and visitation matters based on what they perceive to be the «best interest» of the child.

At Brickley Law, we understand the impact child custody decisions have on divorcing couples and their families.

The key is ensuring judicial officers consider in criminal (i.e., child abuse) and custody cases the broad range impact abuse has on children to make more informed decisions on placement, parenting time, and to protect children from further mistreatment from an abusive parent.