Sentences with phrase «custody of a child when»

The question of who should receive custody of a child when a custodial parent dies is a difficult one.
In fact, judges are and should be eager to grant fathers custody of their children when doing so serves the best interests of the child.
A parent is said to have legal custody of a child when that parent makes the important decisions in the child's life.
While we will never be able to get back the time and raising his daughter who is now 16, we want the child support that the state took while they kept custody of his child when they shouldn't have.
These hearings are most commonly a part of a divorce proceeding, but may also occur when a grandparent or other figure seeks custody of a child when the parents are unable to provide proper care.
While state laws vary, a parent will generally file a responsive declaration for child custody, also known as an answer, after the other parent has filed for custody of the children when the parents do not agree on the custody arrangement.
Missouri law favors joint custody of children when parents separate, so that children have «frequent, continuing...
Missouri law favors joint custody of children when parents separate, so that children have «frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with both parents.»
A parent is said to have legal custody of a child when that parent makes the important decisions in the child's life.
When parents divorce, many prefer to arrange for joint custody of the children when possible.
Soon, PAS became a hot issue in gender wars, especially when women began losing legal custody of their children when a court ruled that they were guilty of alienating a child against the father.

Not exact matches

One of the women, Leigh Corfman, said she was just 14 when she met Moore outside a courthouse before a child custody hearing.
Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...
When it has come to leadership in the Canadian government, women being favoured over men, 3 % of deaths in the workplace being women, 0.1 % of deaths in military service being women, 90 % of cases in dispute over child custody in divorces being awarded in favour of women.
When was the last time a Christian was denied custody of their children?
lmao sure tell that the the hormone driven teens of the world... you can only have woopie if your going to marry, marriage will go through the roof... but so will divorce and lawyers will love that mentality because child custody battles make them loads of money and let's not forget the physcologist / phychiatrists that will make big money having to help all these emotionally damaged adults that were dragged through custody battles due to the fact their genetic donors procreated when it was the best time for them.
One thing makes me feel very uncomfortable when I see parent fools their children by lying to them that an old dude with the name of Santa will come and get you gifts or anything you wish for... and they put things under the tree and make these poor children know that these are from Santa... and its being done generation after generation... parents now were victimized when they were child by their parents and they are repeating the same with their children and it is now in a loop and no one seems to be wanting to get out of the loop which is plain lie and very clear... but these poor children has nothing to do as they under the custody of these parents...
On many points, decisions of Islamic religious courts have the force of national law (a touchy issue when a dispute involves a Muslim and a non-Muslim, or when one spouse in an existing marriage converts to Islam and makes the other members of the family subject to Shari'a determinations on matters such as child custody).
And even when custody and economic support for children are not an issue, the pauperization of women often is.
The upshot is that «many do not attempt to be awarded custody of their children for fear of fighting a losing battle, even when welfare professionals agree that children would be better placed in their primary care.»
Even if you're being «forced» to go along with this form of child custody when it wasn't exactly your top choice, these unexpected perks can be pretty convincing.
An Alabama court may order joint custody with or without the consent of both parents when it serves the child's best interests.
They fall under the umbrella of what's called the «best interests of the child» doctrine, a list of factors a judge must consider when awarding custody.
For example, the court will award sole custody when it's in the best interests of the child's emotional, mental or physical well - being.
A family court's award of joint custody will determine where the child will physically live and when, and the court will also make a determination regarding how major decisions regarding his health, education, and religious needs will be made.
The state also allows parents to request a modification of child custody when evidence of a significant change in circumstances can be proven.
Some things are better left out of the child's ear, many things when it comes to divorce, custody battles, or visitation schedules.
We were on our way to court to gain custody of our first child when the social worker phoned me to say that our daughter's first mother wanted to meet us.
When a divorce occurs and one parent has physical custody of the children, that parent's responsibility is fulfilled by being the custodial parent.
In Maine, when parents request joint custody, the court will agree to this arrangement unless the court decides joint custody is not in the best interests of the child.
When determining custody, they also aim to keep all other aspects of the child's life consistent while ensuring that both parents have the opportunity be an active part of the child's life.
The woman is now a single mom sharing custody of her three precious children, trying to constructively fill the time when they are gone to help her bear the agony of their absence.
Many parents share custody of their children, which presents a unique problem when it comes to potty training.
There are several issues that must be considered when considering which parent should maintain custody of a child with special needs.
Joint custody, he asserts, involves each parent's having joint control over the care, upbringing and education of the children, even though the children reside most of the year with one parent, while divided custody involves each * 272 parent's having the children for a part of the year with control over the children only when in his or her custody.
Then, a couple of years later, when your gurgling baby turns into a beautiful, walking, talking little person, mum suddenly files for divorce — and demands custody of the child you reared while she made her fortune.
See, e. g., Utley v. Utley, 364 A. 2d 1167, 1170 (D.C.App.1976)(«A happy and normal family life is often impossible of accomplishment when a child of tender years is subjected to the frustrating experience of divided custody especially when in the process he is shifted from home to home, from city to city, or from one family environment to another.»)
(16) A prospective adoptive parent, approved by an adoption agency, when considering adopting an abused child in the custody of a county agency.
Another potentially problematic situation is when a couple marries after the birth of a child, as in one New York case when the court denied a nonbiological, married but not adoptive mother's petition for joint custody.
The court must ask itself when making custody decisions: Will this decision meet the appropriate needs of the child?
Also, Minnesota's Voluntary Recognition of Parentage form, which establishes a legal relationship between father and child when the parents are not married to each other, spells out dads» rights in black and white: «When a child is born to parents who are not married to each other the law gives custody of the child to the motwhen the parents are not married to each other, spells out dads» rights in black and white: «When a child is born to parents who are not married to each other the law gives custody of the child to the motWhen a child is born to parents who are not married to each other the law gives custody of the child to the mother.
If parents have joint physical custody of three children all at different stages of development, an iron clad schedule, of who has the children when, does not allow for the needs of the individual children.
When sharing physical custody of children, the question that must be constantly being answered is not who is best for the child, but what is needed by this child at this particular time.
When it comes to parental rights, fathers often fear a bias or discrimination in favor of mothers in child custody and child support cases.
The study, published in the Journal of Family Psychology, debunks the myth found today in courtrooms all around America that it is not a problem when one parent relocates, whether that parent has custody of the children or not.
When that happens, there's often a court order requiring CPS to take custody of any unborn children.
This book can help any dad understand the ramifications of a child custody battle and how to make the process work better for his kids when he tries to get the children out of a toxic environment with their mother.
The court primarily considers the best interests of the child when making custody decisions, and the state has gone on record that it believes joint custody is in a child's best interests.
While judges do not want to take children away from their parents, they err on the side of caution when it comes to any type of domestic abuse and child custody.
Typically, when a parent is motivated by the desire to avoid conflict or communication with the other parent, but both parents are available and equally fit, the courts will reject the request for sole legal custody and require the parents to learn how to work together for the sake of the children.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z