What would motivate the world's richest corporations to make a policy change to
cut fossil fuel energy use in their company to under 10 % by 2050 or else?
Reacting to recent research finding that Americans were more likely to follow advice on
cutting fossil fuel energy use from climate scientists who had also taken personal steps to decarbonize, Anthony Watts carried out what he described as an «ariel survey» of climate scientists» homes.
Not exact matches
That logic is another reason why OPEC countries have less of an incentive to
cut back production: renewable
energy sources is starting to give
fossil fuels some serious competition, and oil - exporting countries have an interest in keeping oil a cheap alternative.
The clean
energy industry's continued ability to
cut costs and reduce the demand for
fossil fuels is pivotal to its success in the coming years.
Energy Secretary Rick Perry implored energy industry leaders on Wednesday to embrace a new era of innovation enabled by fewer regulations, fossil - fuel development and Trump tax
Energy Secretary Rick Perry implored
energy industry leaders on Wednesday to embrace a new era of innovation enabled by fewer regulations, fossil - fuel development and Trump tax
energy industry leaders on Wednesday to embrace a new era of innovation enabled by fewer regulations,
fossil -
fuel development and Trump tax
cuts.
The
energy industry is now enabled by fewer regulations,
fossil -
fuel developments and Trump tax
cuts, Perry says.
It's also giving the
fossil fuels sector whiplash from a White House whose
energy policies have otherwise been very good to them, from starting to undo greenhouse gas regulations to opening more public land to mining and drilling and tax
cuts.
A Republican tax bill unveiled on Thursday included
cuts to renewable
energy tax credits considered critical to enabling wind projects to compete with
fossil fuel plants, but tax breaks for Continue Reading
The report, hinged on the implications of climate change, came at a time when
energy experts were insisting that unless countries drastically
cut greenhouse gas emissions by moving away from
fossil fuels, climate change would remain inevitable.
The plant's water recovery plant exceeded its designers» high expectations in its first year of service while also providing valuable biogas for boiler heating, reducing its dependence on
fossil fuels and ultimately
cutting overall
energy needs by 15 per cent.
The GWE technology involved in the latest installation at CCN is represented in Australia and New Zealand by CST Wastewater Solutions, which installed similar technology at the Bluetongue Brewery in NSW, where it is saving
fossil fuel and
cutting the brewery's overall
energy consumption by about 15 per cent.
The waste water treatment and green
energy plant at the $ 120 million Pacific Beverages» Bluetongue Brewery in NSW also provides valuable renewable
energy for the brewery, reducing its dependence on
fossil fuels and ultimately
cutting overall
energy needs by 15 per cent.
Meanwhile, they stand to make billions more by keeping us hooked on increasingly expensive
fossil fuels — instead of developing UK clean
energy and
energy saving measures needed to secure power supplies,
cut emissions, and stabilise
fuel bills in the long - run.
Friends of the Earth said: «Chris Huhne is right to target the Big Six, but his fighting talk must be matched with bold action to slash
energy waste and
cut our dependency on expensive
fossil fuels.»
His score reflects his votes for
cutting down New York's wetlands, stalling the state's effort to modernize our
energy infrastructure, giving handouts to
fossil fuel companies, and shortchanging the DEC on critical funding.
While no countries put forward new targets, all of them — from emissions giant Australia to tiny Niue (population 1,398) inscribed their domestic carbon -
cutting,
fossil -
fuel reducing, renewable
energy and
energy efficiency goals as part of the declaration.
By adopting lighting technologies that use less
energy the nations of the world will
cut down on the
fossil fuels, often coal, burned to produce that light.
The proposed
cuts include $ 269.78 billion from
energy programs, including $ 158.7 billion of
fossil fuel subsidies; $ 167.09 billion of agricultural subsidies, including $ 89.82 billion of federal crop insurance disaster aid; $ 212.02 billion of transportation subsidies, including $ 125.80 billion of general revenue transfers to the Highway Trust Fund; $ 101.8 billion of federal flood, crop and nuclear insurance subsidies; and $ 24.99 billion from wasteful or environmental damaging public lands and water projects.
A push for oil sands oversight and new climate targets Harper has been a target of environmentalists for most of his tenure — they say he turned Canada into an international pariah by not regulating greenhouse gases from oil and gas,
cutting clean
energy and climate science programs, withdrawing from the Kyoto Protocol, «muzzling» scientists, pressing aggressively on Keystone XL and
fossil fuels, and allowing the country's emissions trajectory to spiral away from targets under the Copenhagen Accord.
Details about the bills are scarce, Cho noted, but «for the third year in a row the Senate panel moved to zero out spending on the United States's contribution to ITER,» «House appropriators would
cut [DOE's
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy] spending by 12 % to $ 1.8 billion,» and «the House energy and water subcommittee would boost spending on the fossil fuels program by 2 % to $ 645 million.&
Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy] spending by 12 % to $ 1.8 billion,» and «the House energy and water subcommittee would boost spending on the fossil fuels program by 2 % to $ 645 million.&
Energy] spending by 12 % to $ 1.8 billion,» and «the House
energy and water subcommittee would boost spending on the fossil fuels program by 2 % to $ 645 million.&
energy and water subcommittee would boost spending on the
fossil fuels program by 2 % to $ 645 million.»
Wind power is one of the key sources of renewable
energy expected to play an important role in helping to
cut emissions and wean society from its dependence on
fossil fuels, which means wind - power companies must be prepared to quickly fix mechanical problems that threaten to slow down renewable
energy production.
A problem is that markets for trading carbon dioxide focus on
cuts in emissions at power plants and factories burning
fossil fuels, not renewable
energies which are viewed as green.
Some want to emulate the success of the United States in bringing down
energy prices via shale gas - a
fossil fuel that can help
cut greenhouse emissions if it replaces coal but at the same time can divert investments from cleaner
energy.
There is also potential for a virtuous cycle: expanding solar
energy production could reduce reliance on
fossil fuels, thus
cutting down on the very emissions that hamper solar power production, Li said.
To
cut our emissions,
fossil fuels need to be replaced with low - carbon
energy sources such as nuclear power and renewables, and
fossil fuel power stations need to be fitted with carbon - capture technology.
Implementing key policies and investments in those three systems — from phasing out
fossil fuels to stopping deforestation to ramping up
energy efficiency — could deliver at least half of the emissions
cuts needed by 2030 to lower the risk of dangerous climate change, said Jeremy Oppenheim, the report's program director.
Global
energy - related emissions could peak by 2020 if
energy efficiency is improved; the construction of inefficient coal plants is banned; investment in renewables is increased to $ 400 billion in 2030 from $ 270 billion in 2014; methane emissions are
cut in oil and gas production and
fossil fuel subsidies are phased out by 2030.
At that point, between the need to
cut CO2 emissions and the fact that we are peaking in
fossil fuel energy production (peak oil theory is looking pretty solid right now!)
That's all fine, but this also means that the climate talks, which head to Durban, South Africa, next year, are not the place to watch for the breakthroughs — social, financial or technological — that will be required if the world is serious about providing some 9 billion people mid-century with the suite of services that come with abundant
energy (mobility, communication, illumination, desalinated water and more) while also greatly
cutting emissions from burning
fossil fuels, which still dominate the global
energy mix.
The wider investigative goal I proposed to ProPublica is to expose «reality gaps» in descriptions of clean -
energy technologies and policies (not to mention policies of those saying the
fossil -
fuel status quo is just fine) and point to under - addressed opportunities to
cut vulnerability to climate - related hazards right now.
Just as we've been the watchdogs of the coal, oil and
fossil fuel, we're going to have keep a similarly critical eye on the green
energy sector to make sure that environmental best practice is adhered to, that corners aren't
cut in the haste to green our respective grids.
Their critics say their stance, however well intentioned, will produce the real delays, given how much can be done now simply by
cutting energy waste with tools already on the shelf — ranging from strengthening efficiency standards to eliminating billions of dollars in persistent
fossil -
fuel subsidies that continue to make coal and oil much cheaper than they really are when all their hidden costs are revealed.
The idea that you could ever replace the rate of utilization of
energy from
fossil fuels, which has been estimated as consuming 400 years worth of photosynthesis per year, with a fraction of the annual photosynthetic harvest that does not impinge on food production is part of today's magical thinking, along with reducing deficits by
cutting taxes while continuing to increase spending.
Officials in the Maldives made the decision after soliciting a report on how to
cut fossil fuel use and otherwise trim the country's climate footprint from Chris Goodall and Mark Lynas, British environmentalists and authors of books on
energy and climate.
In theory, change can come through a mix of a) increasing public will to shift behavior and priorities for the sake of
cutting a long - term risk and b) lowering the cost difference between non-polluting
energy choices and conventional use of
fossil fuels.
Even after decades of increasingly dire warnings, the US has still not passed comprehensive federal legislation to combat global warming; Canada has abandoned past pledges in order to exploit its emissions - heavy tar sands; China continues to depend on coal for its
energy production; Indonesia's effort to stem widespread deforestation is facing stiff resistance from industry; Europe is mulling pulling back on its more ambitious
cuts if other nations do not join it; northern nations are scrambling to exploit the melting Arctic for untapped oil and gas reserves; and
fossil fuels continue to be subsidized worldwide to the tune of $ 400 billion.
King said green
energy already had advantages over
fossil fuel power in
cutting deadly air pollution and reducing the carbon emissions that drive global warming.
Instead Chairman Hochberg and the Bank continue to doggedly promote deadly and outdated
fossil fuel technology at a time when the rest of the world is investing in the
cutting edge, emerging clean
energy sector.
At the same time the study showcased how wind
energy can dramatically
cut emissions, save billions in
fossil fuel costs and generate new export opportunities.
Even though
energy efficiency is seen as a valuable approach for
cutting energy costs, the report argues for renewables as an option to supplement
fossil fuels for the foreseeable future.
Their goal is to
cut greenhouse gas emissions and promote transition to a green
energy economy through a revenue neutral «carbon fee and dividend» approach to pricing carbon pollution from
fossil fuels.
But we could commit ourselves, tomorrow, to radically
cutting our
fossil fuel emissions and beginning the shift to zero - carbon sources of
energy based on renewable technology, with a full - blown transition underway within the decade.
Car dependence and labour - saving devices have
cut the
energy people expend as they go about their lives, at the same time increasing the amount of
fossil fuel they burn.
«The answer to our climate,
energy and economic challenges does not lie in burning more dirty
fossil fuels — instead, we must continue to press for much more rapid development of renewable
energy and
energy efficient technologies and
cuts in the pollution that causes global warming.»
The EPA says the Kemper County
Energy Facility offers a real - life example that it is possible to go on burning the dirtiest of
fossil fuels and still make the
cuts in carbon dioxide emissions needed to avoid a climate catastrophe.
The IEA also notes drastic improvements in air pollution,
cuts in
fossil fuel import bills and lower household
energy expenditures would complement the decarbonisation achieved, if well designed policies are used.
Today 350 works on grassroots campaigns across the globe: from opposing coal plants and mega-pipelines, to building renewable
energy solutions and
cutting financial ties of the
fossil fuel industry.
UBS analysts say utilities in Europe need to shut down 30 % of their gas, coal, and oil - fed power capacity by 2017, not to fight global warming,
cut pollution, or
cut fuel imports, but because renewable
energy is pushing
fossil fuels off the grid.
Reducing environmental impact includes reducing
energy and water use,
cutting back on
fossil fuel used in transportation, reducing waste headed to landfill and protecting natural habitats.
Governments in many nations are finding a shortfall as
fossil fuels are being
cut back, meaning nuclear
energy is the only way in which the
energy gap can be filled.