Not exact matches
During his campaign, Trump also called
global warming a hoax and promised to quit a
global accord to
cut greenhouse
gas emissions, though he has since softened his stance and said he is keeping an «open mind» about the deal.
The United States, under former President Barack Obama, had pledged as part of the Paris accord to
cut U.S. greenhouse
gas emissions by as much as 28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025 to help slow
global warming.
After many years of vague talk by governments about fighting
global warming, it is encouraging that the debate has finally begun to tackle specific mechanisms to achieve
cuts in greenhouse
gas emissions.Â
Climate scientists tell us that to keep the rise of
global temperature above the pre-industrial level at below 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) in order to avoid runaway
global warming, the world must
cut greenhouse
gas emissions by 15 percent per year starting in 2020.
Imagine if the world's two largest polluters unilaterally decide to
cut emissions of carbon dioxide, the ubiquitous
gas responsible for the bulk of
global warming.
It has been suggested that climate engineering could be used to postpone
cuts to greenhouse
gas emissions while still achieving the objectives of limiting
global warming to under 2 degrees, as set in the Paris Climate Agreement.
«Significant» reductions needed The U.N. Environment Programme's «Emissions Gap 2012» report cautions that even if nations meet their strictest pledges, the world will not be able to
cut its output of greenhouse
gases in time to prevent runaway
global warming (ClimateWire, Nov. 21).
Deep
cuts in greenhouse
gas emissions of 40 to 70 percent by mid-century will be needed to avert the worst of
global warming that is already harming all continents, a draft U.N. report showed.
This is unacceptable at a time when leading scientists from all over the world are warning that greenhouse
gases must be
cut by at least 60 percent over the next half a century to avert the worst consequences of
global warming.
Of course, modern
global warming stems from a clear cause — rising levels of CO2 (and other greenhouse
gases) from fossil fuel burning,
cutting down forests and other human activities.
It's going to take
cutting out most further greenhouse
gas pollution to restrain further
global warming.
The Chinese government is preparing to adopt its first programme to
cut its greenhouse
gas emissions, which contribute to
global warming.
«The president is opposed to mandatory caps on greenhouse
gases, opposing a mandatory 10 -[mile - per - gallon] increase in cars and trucks, opposing a national renewable electricity standard, opposing state efforts to
cut emissions from cars, and pushing for new sources of dangerous pollution from liquid coal,» said Rep. Ed Markey (D — Mass.), chairman of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and
Global Warming, in a statement released after the speech.
Raymond Pierrehumbert, an Oxford University atmospheric physics professor who believes
cutting carbon dioxide emissions is more urgent than
cutting methane emissions, said Howarth's research offers little new information about the role of natural
gas production in
global warming.
He seemed to hit his stride from 2008 through 2010, when those fighting efforts to
cut greenhouse
gas emissions were buoyed by email hacks, the Great Recession, the breakdown of climate talks in Copenhagen and a stutter - step in the
global warming trend.
In recent years, Dr. Pachauri has been a target of some writers, scientists and research groups who challnge the consensus on
global warming or who oppose actions to make big
cuts in greenhouse
gases.
In advance of President Obama's speech Tuesday afternoon laying out his three - pronged plan to
cut releases of greenhouse
gases and the impacts of
global warming, White House officials circulated detailed fact sheets and discussed the plans with journalists, including me, last night.
Even as the United States and other countries explore ways to
cut emissions of greenhouse
gases linked to
global warming, some
warming is already locked in, the latest big studies have firmly concluded.
While pressing for
cuts in greenhouse -
gas emissions and better efforts to control hunting, both legal and illegal, the participating scientists concluded on an optimistic note, saying they were «optimistic that humans can mitigate the effects of
global warming and other threats to polar bears, and ensure that they remain a part of the Arctic ecosystem in perpetuity.»
The findings came from the Climate Accountability Institute, an entity led by Richard Heede, whose company, Climate Mitigation Services, advises companies, municipalities and others on how to
cut greenhouse
gases, and Naomi Oreskes, the Harvard historian and co-author of «Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to
Global Warming.»
James E. Hansen, the NASA climate expert who has long been a bellwether for
global warming campaigners, has strongly endorsed one of the less - popular options — a variant on the «cap and dividend» system for
cutting greenhouse -
gas emissions.
The full quote was «In a long, and interesting speech, he characterized what the U.S. and other industrialized nations need to do to combat
global warming this way: «We just have to slow down our economy and
cut back our greenhouse
gas emissions «cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.
It's hardly new for some Republicans to acknowledge the basics of
global warming science (see Newt Gingrich in 2007) and call for steps to limit heat - trapping
gases and
cut vulnerability.
James E. Hansen, the head of Goddard and an outspoken campaigner for prompt
cuts in greenhouse -
gas emissions, explained that the decades - long
global warming trend and patterns of
warming remain consistent with a growing influence on climate from the planet's building blanket of heat - trapping greenhouse
gases.
If the world's nations really do intend to contain
global warming to within 2 °C, there is no alternative to drastic
cuts in greenhouse
gas emissions, according to a new study.
Even after decades of increasingly dire warnings, the US has still not passed comprehensive federal legislation to combat
global warming; Canada has abandoned past pledges in order to exploit its emissions - heavy tar sands; China continues to depend on coal for its energy production; Indonesia's effort to stem widespread deforestation is facing stiff resistance from industry; Europe is mulling pulling back on its more ambitious
cuts if other nations do not join it; northern nations are scrambling to exploit the melting Arctic for untapped oil and
gas reserves; and fossil fuels continue to be subsidized worldwide to the tune of $ 400 billion.
Posted in Carbon, Development and Climate Change,
Global Warming, Green House
Gas Emissions, Pollution, Weather Comments Off on Study Rebuts IPCC, Calls For More Severe Emissions
Cuts
California's
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the state to
cut greenhouse
gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
The tools exist to
cut greenhouse
gas emissions enough to meet aggressive
global warming caps, but it may take more catastrophes like Hurricane Katrina to forge the political will, a top U.N. expert said.
But it's pretty edgy, given 10:10's aim of asking people, businesses and organisations to take positive action against
global warming by
cutting their greenhouse
gas emissions by 10 % in a year, and thereby pressuring governments to act.
While President Bush's recent public statements seem to indicate that he may also be falling for
global warming junk science so far, he's only for voluntary
cuts in greenhouse
gas emissions as well as «technology - based solutions.
The Independent Online reports that an unprecedented coalition of blue - chip US companies and environmental lobby groups will urge President Bush next week to get serious about
global warming, calling for caps on carbon dioxide emissions that would
cut greenhouse
gases by 10 - 30 per cent over 15 years.
In 2006, the European Union (EU), which consists of 27 members, committed to reducing its
global warming emissions by at least 20 percent of 1990 levels by 2020, to consuming 20 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2020, and to reducing its primary energy use by 20 percent from projected levels through increased energy efficiency.1 The EU has also committed to spending $ 375 billion a year to
cut greenhouse
gas emissions by at least 80 percent by 2050 compared to 1990 levels.2 The EU is meeting these goals through binding national commitments which vary depending on the unique situation of a given country but which average out to the overall targets.
The weather we've seen this fall may or may not be due to the
global warming trend, but it's certainly a clear picture of what the future is going to look like if we don't act quickly to
cut emissions of the greenhouse
gases.
Deep
cuts in greenhouse
gas emissions of 40 to 70 per cent by mid-century will be needed to avert the worst of
global warming that is already harming all continents, a draft UN report shows.
Posted in
Global Warming, Green House
Gas Emissions Comments Off on Draft UN Support Says Drastic Emissions
Cuts Needed By 2050 To Curb
Global Warming
Agriculture is among the greatest contributors to
global warming, emitting more greenhouse
gases than all our cars, trucks, trains, and airplanes combined - largely from methane released by cattle and rice farms, nitrous oxide from fertilized fields and carbon dioxide from the
cutting of rain forests to grow crops or raise livestock.
Goklany asks what is the basis for the claim that 450 ppm — or a maximum of 2 °C
warming or a 50 %
cut in
global greenhouse
gas emissions by midcentury — is the «correct target» for humanity.
In order to avoid the most devastating impacts of
global warming, climate scientists have warned that emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases need to be
cut in order to keep the increase in average
global temperature to less than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius).
The
global warming law requires California to
cut its greenhouse
gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
International negotiators at the Lima climate change talks have agreed on a plan to fight
global warming that would for the first time commit all countries to
cutting their greenhouse
gas emissions.
We are a student whose entire future depends on rapid
cuts to greenhouse
gases to combat
global warming.
The latest report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stresses the risks of
global warming and tries to make a stronger case for governments to adopt policy on adaptation and
cut greenhouse
gas emissions.
UBS analysts say utilities in Europe need to shut down 30 % of their
gas, coal, and oil - fed power capacity by 2017, not to fight
global warming,
cut pollution, or
cut fuel imports, but because renewable energy is pushing fossil fuels off the grid.
he reported, «It may be POLITICALLY impossible to
cut back fast enough on greenhouse
gas emissions to do anything
global warming.
[From Green Car Congress:] California legislative leaders and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger reached agreement on a compromise version of an assembly bill (AB 32 — the California
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) that is intended to bring statewide emissions of greenhouse
gases back down to 1990 levels by 2020 — an estimated
cut of 25 %.
Little over two months remain before a UN deal to tackle
global warming is set to be signed off, and already it is evident planned greenhouse
gas cuts will not be enough.
In a March 19, 2007 «The Osgood File», he reported, «It may be POLITICALLY impossible to
cut back fast enough on greenhouse
gas emissions to do anything
global warming.
There is no solution to the problem of
global warming without
cutting emissions of greenhouse
gases.
36
Cut fossil fuel use (especially coal) Solutions
Global Warming Prevention Cleanup Cut fossil fuel use (especially coal) Remove CO2 from smoke stack and vehicle emissions Shift from coal to natural gas Store (sequester) CO2 by planting trees Improve energy efficiency Sequester CO2 deep underground Shift to renewable energy resources Sequester CO2 in soil by using no - till cultivation and taking cropland out of production Transfer energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies to developing countries Reduce deforestation Figure 20.14 Solutions: methods for slowing atmospheric warming during this c
Warming Prevention Cleanup
Cut fossil fuel use (especially coal) Remove CO2 from smoke stack and vehicle emissions Shift from coal to natural
gas Store (sequester) CO2 by planting trees Improve energy efficiency Sequester CO2 deep underground Shift to renewable energy resources Sequester CO2 in soil by using no - till cultivation and taking cropland out of production Transfer energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies to developing countries Reduce deforestation Figure 20.14 Solutions: methods for slowing atmospheric
warming during this c
warming during this century.