Not exact matches
The government, it said, remained
on course for a # 10 billion surplus in 2019 - 20, but only by delaying capital investment, promising further
cuts in
spending on public services, and bringing forward a one - off boost to corporation tax receipts into 2019 - 20.
It's possible that the
cuts will have taken such a toll
on public services by then that we'll be hollering for more
spending, but I see no sign of it just yet.
Of course, it is true that population growth of any kind puts pressure
on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in
public services represents a political choice by the current Conservative government, which has opted to
spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees
on tax
cuts for businesses and reducing the deficit rather than expanding healthcare and education provision.
[6] Correspondingly, classical liberals tended to favour
cutting taxes for the poorest in order to increase opportunity, contrasting with social liberals, who would rather see higher
spending on public services and the disadvantaged in order to reduce income inequality.
Come 2015 or whenever the next election is, Labour isn't going to go into the election pledging to
spend # 1 billion
on giving cash handouts to the richest 15 % of families, and in a fortnight there are # 12 billion in welfare
cuts plus untold billions more in
cutting public services which will be higher priorities to oppose and pledge to reverse.
The BRC's warning will make uncomfortable reading for ministers, as the coalition has staked its economic policy of
cutting spending on the projection that the private sector will be able to soak up a great deal of the job losses from
public services, which will result from the
spending review revealed
on October 20th.
The
public is divided, split down the middle,
on the merits of deficit reduction if it means
cuts to
spending on public services.
The opposition wants to
spend the cash from the City
on tax credits,
cutting the deficit,
spending on public services, the bits of the regional growth fund Miliband likes, and even turning empty shops into cultural community centres.
It seems rather incongruous that he should
spend half of his time
on seemingly narrow tasks like trying to get local councils to
cut out waste and be more efficient at providing
public services, and the other half of his time
on «Communities» - ie religion.
He insisted Labour's plans for extra
spending on police and other
public services, to be funded by an estimated # 2.7 bn in savings from reversing capital gains tax
cuts, were «fully costed».
And when we're done with these
cuts,
spending on public services will actually still be at the same level as it was in 2006.
As Fraser Nelson writes: «If
spending can be more than doubled with little or not effect
on services (some, like education, have grown worse) why should [the
public] believe that
cuts should be so damaging?»
Once we factor in
spending on the likes of debt interest and benefits, the government's figures show
spending on public services will have to be
cut between 2011 and 2014.
Education is an investment in the future, leading eventually to higher productivity, better social outcomes and reduced
spending on other
public services;
cuts to this budget are a false economy.»
If that's true, she should start by calling time
on spending cuts and start funding our
public services properly.
As always, there are competing calls for the Chancellor to commit to new
spending or tax
cuts — including from
public services which have already been squeezed; speculated costs associated with leaving the EU; delivering
on ambitions for housing; and taxpayers feeling the pinch of inflation.
Tomorrow — February 24, 2016 — the Connecticut General Assembly's Education Committee will be holding a
public hearing
on legislation that Governor Malloy and Lt. Governor Wyman submitted as part of their destructive proposed state budget, a
spending plan that that coddles the rich while making massive
cuts to vital health, human
service and education programs.
Family support
services also
cut down
on future
public spending because families become more self - sufficient.