Not exact matches
For example, the fiscal squeeze that began with the «Geddes Axe»
under the UK's last Liberal - Conservative
coalition in 1921 - 2 (and implemented in the following three years
under three different
governments) was also based on spending
cuts alone, and went far deeper even than the plans announced by George Osborne.
This time last week he was chief secretary to the Treasury, responsible for implementing the spending
cuts which the Lib - Con
coalition government says are needed to get Britain's structural deficit
under control.
The
cuts, which began
under the
coalition government, have led some forces to share services while many have also reduced costs by closing police stations, reducing procurement costs and reorganising the workforce.
Chris Keates: «Teachers have had their pay
cut by thousands of pounds over the last four and half years
under this
Coalition Government».
Britain deserves a thorough, coherent, robust opposition, especially
under a
coalition government, especially
under such severe economic
cuts.
Ten months later he repeated this position in spades in a shadow cabinet meeting: «the shadow chancellor bluntly warned colleagues that even
under a Labour
government there would have to be serious
cuts», perhaps referring to the
Coalition's # 30 billion «hit list» being drawn up in the treasury.
«Austerity policies
under this
Government and its
Coalition predecessor have already resulted in
cuts to early years education and Sure Start provision, but yet more attacks are planned.
16 - 19 funding was slashed by 14 %
under the
Coalition and now faces a further real terms
cut of around 8 %
under the present
Government.
Although school funding was maintained in real - terms per pupil
under the
Coalition Government, all additional funding was provided via the Pupil Premium, targeted at particular pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by
cuts in the value of other funding.
In spite of the severe
cuts to public funding implemented
under the
coalition government, the mood of the assembled legal aid lawyers remained defiant and optimistic.