I feel like
the cut was a good move for the company and that they will recover.
I feel like
the cut was a good move for the company and that they will recover.
Not exact matches
Economists tell us that quitting
is actually often the smart
move and that while humans have a natural tendency to avoid losing sunk costs (otherwise known «throwing
good money after bad»),
cutting your losses
is frequently the
better course of action.
It may
be clich, but plenty of companies invest too much money into initiatives longer than they should when it may
be better to
cut losses, learn some lessons and
move on.
There
are lots of
moving numbers here, but the point
is clear: As standalone companies with ever - falling revenue, each will have a more direct responsibility for paying off debt, and the likeliest place to pay for it may
well be more aggressive staff
cuts.
The attempted project cost the company around 6 billion dollars but sometimes it
is best to
cut your losses and
move on.
The manufacturing sector and services sector
are doing quite
well, sentiment
is actually quite strong, and, in fact, we
are right now
moving into Q1 earnings season, and with the tax
cuts that
were enacted at the end of last year, corporations
are expected to increase their earnings by 17 %.
The
move in implied odds of a rate
cut for the upcoming meeting
was...
well, I
'm not sure, but would
be willing to bet it
's one of the biggest ever (excluding days on which rate decisions have
been made).
Stocks rose sharply in the United States and Europe on news the referendum plan had
been scrapped, as
well as a surprise
move by the European Central Bank to
cut interest rates.
Important lesson
is that if a company
cuts it once, it can
cut in future also and probably
better to
move on.
Second, perhaps if you would actually address the posts that have
been cut and pasted in response to your arguments with something beyond double talk and hiding behind recitation of scripture that means little to those who do not believe, and actually state viable,
well thought out arguments to said posts, then the board could
move on to more meaningful discussion.
Monaco don't want to sell him and Mbappe this season as they
are their
best players.We should
move for Mahrez before it
's too late whether Sanchez leaves or does not.We need a left footed player with
cutting edge like him.
Romeu
is coming with Premier League pedigree and can sit affront the back three and help intervene to
cut off the opposition
moves early on — forcing the opponents to errors that can
be then
be better dealt with in the defending department.
life
is all about gambles, you win some you lose some, we have taken a gamble on the likes of Walcott, Gibbs and its not paid off so lets
cut our losses and
move them on, if they go to another club and realise their so called potentials so
be it, we can not keep giving them chances in the hope they will come
good when all indications shows they
are just average players who won the lottery with Arsenal....
I personally believe that Wenger didn't push to have the contracts of Sanchez, Ozil, Ramsey and Ox renewed earlier because he
was going to use it as leverage when renegotiating his own deal... so far that tactic has backfired as we know little more about this squad
moving forward than we did in May and Wenger clearly misjudged just how important his staying would
be to both Sanchez and Ox... I like Lacazette, but I liked him a lot more 2 years ago at 20 million less... Sead might come
good but once again he wasn't a necessity buy, except that he
was a free transfer and
was signed early... another «wag the dog» tactic employed by the powers that
be... as for the rest of the roster, very little has changed, except that it
's way too big and lacks the
cutting edge to take this club to new heights.
The lad the ball in his feet
is good, can dribble and shoot
well but the problem
is that he has not the striker
moving awareness.He
is barely useful in the middle because of that.I
am not a coach but I would see him
well in the left playing a la Henry.Remember henry use to like to play on the left using his pace to cross or
cut in the middle and slice it in the corner, that he could do.
We should
cut bait and
move on to Snead, who
's a
better fit for us anyway.
He always gets into
good crossing positions but then he stops and kills the attack, he
cuts in or waits and waits until he
is closed down, then the
move is gone..
The whole reason why we
cut our self loose from Highbury and
move to a bigger stadium
was to
be able to compete with the
best.
But did you notice on Saturday that we actually
moved the ball around a lot quicker and we stopped looking for him on the left so he can keep
cutting inside and estimg up laca space I believe laca suffered a bit with him in the team as the sevice
was lacking to him and it always went to Sanchez and now he
is suffering from a lack of confidence He will come
good and now we have an awesome front line again.
His marketability makes him incredibly valuable, and though he may
move for a
cut price of around # 30million, he
is probably worth closer to # 57million and will
be a big business boost for whichever club signs him, due to the number of shirts he would sell, and of course his influence on the pitch when he reaches his
best form.
When we needed him most after establishing himself as one of the
best midfielders in the league he turned his back and
was willing to take a pay -
cut and force through a
move to Barcelona.
(1) this squad has way too many
moving parts and very few of our players
are good enough at their preferred position let alone relying on them in whatever position Wenger and his magic eight ball decide in the tunnel prior to the game... when teams do this it generally signals issues within the club, much like Jose last year and Van Gael before him... no one gets settled, the chemistry
is almost non-existent and if provides a built - in excuse when the team comes up short... these issues fall squarely on Wenger, both for his decisions regarding players coming in and for his inability to rid the team of those players who aren't
cutting it... in actually fact we have only 6 real starters on this current squad and that
's being generous (Sanchez, Ozil, Lacazette, Sead, Kos & Cazorla)... which
is discouraging because Cazorla
is injured and might never play again, Sanchez
is wanting out and the club
is lying to us about his injury status, Lacazette receives no service, Ozil
is relatively disinterested out there, Kos
is getting up there and Sead
is just trying to settle in... there isn't a single other player that would start regularly on any of the other top 3 teams, which should
be the standard... imagine this team
moving forward if Wenger only sells before the window closes
There
were rumours and reports that Wenger
was about to launch a
move for Khedira for a
cut rate transfer fee of around # 12 million, which may
well have
been enough even though the Spanish club wanted more, because they also need to watch the balancing of their books.
This House of Cards created by the thin - skinned narcissist and our absentee landlord
is going to come crashing down over the next 12 months and anyone who doesn't put the success of the club ahead of blind allegiances will need to check themselves so that we can
move forward once the dust has settled... this club has
been on auto - pilot for far too long and the same old, same old just won't
cut it in the new EPL where many of the
best managers, players and deepest pockets in the world now reside... just think to yourself what has transpired in the last 7 years alone: Leicester City won the EPL, Chelsea and ManCity have changed several managers and still won the League on multiple occasions, ManU lost Fergie yet we still didn't take advantage, Liverpool has emerged from their slumber and the Spurs
are presently the
better team in North London... if you find this acceptable, I feel for you and this future of this club... hope you all enjoy fighting with Everton and West Ham for the final Europa spot every year (aka the new Wenger Cup)
But with his track record as one of the world
's best, United would
be foolish not to consider a
cut - price
move, just in case he
's not broken once and for all.
It
is interesting to hear Wenger state in the last few days that he hoped Cesc will
be with us for a
good 2 or 3 seasons, just when it coincided with Barcelona declaring that they
are making drastic
cuts to their wage bill on and off the field.They literally have no cash to spend and though asset rich, the effects of the Spanish economy
are taking affect.I think Cesc has accepted that and will show full commitment to Arsenal.He
is pivotal to any success we may achieve.His whole body language has changed, he looks generally much more content, and he can put to the back of his mind, at least for the time
being any proposed
move, and that for us
is a
good thing.Barca
are disguising their troubles by saying yet again they have made no official approach to our club, purely to save face.
hleb has
moved on due to some personal reasons and we should
cut the dude some slack because while he played for us, he played his heart and soul out, same goes for flamini and gilberto and henry... lets keep our criticisms on the pitch and remeber that no matter which side
is wrong or who
is greedy, what counts
is how they performed on the pitch and they did that very
well... we should
be happy we do nt have players that play rubbish on the field when their hearts
are not with the club or when they
are not satisfied... i personally pay tribute to gilberto, flamini, adebayor (if he leaves) diarra (hope its not too late) and hleb.
And it
's not just a simple matter of «parking the bus» as many of Burnley
's detractors describe it, the back 4 especially as
well as the 3 - 5 CMs spend a lot of time practicing
cutting down on the shooting lanes so goalie Heaton has less goal to cover and generally doesn't need to
move too far to get behind a shot.
I think Garcia may have
been on to something when he
moved Iturbe centrally in the second Fiorentina game because Juan
's a
better finisher than Gervinho and it allows Iturbe to make simple
cut - backs to players in front of the net, rather than attempt 1 - v - 1
's and get to the byline like Gervinho.
For instance the price
is a great bargain and the quick fold system works
best to
cut time when I want to
move out quickly and pack the stroller with me.
The vast majority of laboring women get individual support from a midwife,
are free to
move about and birth in whatever position feels
best, and
are rarely induced, anesthetized, or
cut.
Replacing Howard with a leader who
is seen as less extreme should help the Conservatives
move people's perception of them closer to the centre ground, and once Labour's leader
is a figure who
is percieved as
being on the other side of the psychological left - right divide they may
be in a
better position to win support back from Labour amongst right - of - centre voters, but either way you
cut it they
are still as by far the most extreme of the three main parties.
«When prices
are going up in our shops, when the country's credit rating has
been cut and when businesses
are actively considering
moving jobs overseas, don't the British people deserve
better than a PM simply running scared?»
The major policy announcement on free school meals
was the obvious
move in this direction — as
well as
being a sop to middle class voters who lost out after
cuts to child benefit — but Nick Clegg's speech
is full of references to policies which help in day - to - day life: the pupil premium, flexible parental leave, free childcare, a cap on social care costs.
The
move is designed to symbolise Labour's determination to reform welfare, making it more closely linked to what people pay in, as
well as
cutting the benefits bill by about # 65m a year.
The results
were quite interesting — most of the answers supported
moving the party towards the centre ground, the public wanted to see the Conservative party
move towards the Centre (net approval of +41), giving more help to the less
well off (net approval of +64), paying more attention to the economy and public services and less to immigration (+41) and opposed promises of big tax
cuts if they meant
cuts to public services (net disapproval of -42).
To
be sure, the legislation creating the — take a deep breath — SUNY Tax - Free Areas to Revitalize and Transform UPstate NY program allows expansions as
well as true start - ups so long as a business
is not
cutting employees somewhere else and
moving them to a START - UP zone simply in order to get the tax break.
First, there have
been significant increases both in the extent of low - paid work as
well as the number of people
moving from low benefit income into low - paid jobs and
being parked there; second,
cuts have
been imposed upon benefits and tax credits claimed by this same group of low - paid workers»
Flajolet stressed that,
moving forward, we need a
better understanding of these plaques, and Alzheimer's hallmarks in general, as the relationship between their presence and the severity of the disease
is not clear -
cut.
And Fauci said that the government
is moving quickly to bring synthetic biology under review by two existing panels that have done a
good job of monitoring
cutting - edge research in the past.
Because the
cuts are very close together, he
is convinced that Jane wasn't
moving around or fighting back when the damage
was inflicted —
good evidence that she
was already dead.
Intel claims that it
's jumped
well ahead of the rest of the chip industry by
moving to a
cutting - edge 14 - nanometer process first.
We
are known for our
cutting edge translational approach to research, our customized solutions, the breadth and quality of our work, as
well as for our ability to identify statistically relevant phenotypic changes, even early and subtle changes, that help our clients quantify the efficacy of their treatments before they
move into the clinic.
Shaving 50 calories a day
is a
good maintenance
move;
cutting 500 calories a day should help you lose a pound a week.
Brown thinks one reason
is the idea that «if I
cut myself down, it will somehow
move me to engage in
better behaviors.»
Without the focus on
moving arms up to essentially do an upwards fly, as
well as twisting the chest as a secondary function in the wood chops (which
is obviously more core) you still won't get a really
cut look
I
am moving towards more carbs, lots of fruits, for energy while reducing my fat intake, so I have
cut down on the coconut oil, but it has
been good for quick energy.
I tried
moving the 5 pm
cut - off point to 3 pm since i have
been feeling
better on your diet, but it
is still necessary.
So we already know that
cutting out sugar
is one of the
best moves you can make for your health, but if you've got a serious sweet tooth — like we have!