Sentences with phrase «cutoff frequencies»

There are two uncertainties associated with the ρ1 model, i.e., sampling rate and running window size, and 16 uncertainties with the DYNOT model, e.g., sampling rate, running window size, and 14 bandpass cutoff frequencies for 7 target orbital frequencies (Supplementary Tab.

It's therefore more like a gaussian filter (which is essentially identical to a 21 - point binomial filter) but with better rejection of frequencies just above F3's cutoff frequency.

Given that the blade is not robust, and the data's 0.003 yr ^ -1 cutoff frequency can not reveal high rates of change or multicentennial temperature extremes, here is an obvious, serious question: Did Mann (who is rumored to have been one of the reviewers) actually read the paper?

I just apply a low pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 1000 years and leave the last 100 years unfiltered using GISS data.

This high frequency light comes in, hit the cold surface, warms it up a bit and emits a black body spectrum of frequencies outward, most of these being below our cutoff frequency of our shell.

The remaining radiation will (after bouncing around back and forth a bit such) generate new radiation above the cutoff frequency.

Its wrong because it ignores the constant reflections and «repopulating» of these angles (for the hole example) or repopulating the radiation above the cutoff frequency (for the case of a frequency hole).

At first glance it seems that we need to have a temperature large enough that when we integrate the radiation above our cutoff frequency we get 100w / m ^ 2 total.

Not exact matches

By adjusting various parameters — such as the density of conduction electrons in the material or the strength of the DC electric field — it is possible to tune the cutoff wavenumber and, consequently, the frequency of the resulting terahertz radiation.

Kucera, T. A., Dennis, B. R., Schwartz, R. A. & Shaw, D. Evidence for a cutoff in the frequency distribution of solar flares from small active regions.

For each prostate cancer - associated mitochondrial genome (z - axis), the minority SNP frequency (y - axis) is plotted against the cell line - associated SNP variant (x-axis), using a frequency cutoff of 3 %.

Shared SNPs in XMRV genomes corresponding to 3 XMRV - positive prostate cancer samples (VP35, VP42, VP62) and LNCaP (z - axis) at a frequency cutoff of 0.5 % are plotted on the graph, with key SNPs highlighted in red.

Both of these cell line - associated XMRV genomes were found to exhibit a lower degree of intra-strain variation than previously reported for XMRV from 22Rv1 cells [20], with only 19 SNPs detected in the 22Rv1 - associated XMRV genome at the 3 % frequency cutoff by deep sequencing, and only 25 SNPs in the LNCaP - associated genome (Fig. 7A; Table S1).

Both agree with the 2 - 3 day cutoff, but disagree on frequency.