, NLJ, 6 January 2017, p 8) and the recent Amnesty International report which made the case for reinstating public funding for cases involving young people, welfare benefits, immigration cases involving human rights and initial advice for private family cases («Cuts that Hurt: The impact of legal aid
cuts on access to justice», Amnesty International, 2016).
The report — Cuts that Hurt: The impact of legal aid
cuts on access to justice — draws on research conducted between October last year and June, including interviews with 30 individuals not eligible for legal aid as a result of LASPO.
Young Legal Aid Lawyers, Legal Aid Practitioners Group and Legal Action Group have sent an open letter to the new Prime Minister, Theresa May, welcoming her vision of «a country that works not for a privileged few but for every one of us» and calling on the government to review the impact of legal aid
cuts on access to justice.
Not exact matches
«These
cuts are having a real impact
on the ability of the most vulnerable in our society
to access justice.
She said «These
cuts are having a real impact
on the ability of the most vulnerable in our society
to access justice.
In the Law Society's press release of the same date, vice-president Christina Blacklaws highlighted the impact
on the budget
cuts on legal aid and
access to justice.
In the Law Society's press release of the same date, vice-president Christina Blacklaws said «These
cuts are having a real impact
on the ability of the most vulnerable in our society
to access justice.
YLAL co-chair Oliver Carter wrote for The
Justice Gap, expressing concern about the impact of further cuts to the MoJ budget on the LASPO review and access to justice gen
Justice Gap, expressing concern about the impact of further
cuts to the MoJ budget
on the LASPO review and
access to justice gen
justice generally.
Against the backdrop of
cuts in legal aid and local authority spending
on legal advice, the profession attempts
to facilitate
access to justice; most notably through pro bono work which assists many individuals who would, without it, ultimately, be deprived of
access to justice.
In the mid 1980's The Florida Bar, the Governor of Florida and the Chief
Justice of the Florida Supreme Court appointed a Commission, The Florida Bar's Special Commission
on Access to the Legal System, to assess and make recommendations on the problem of lack of adequate access to the legal system by the poor and middle class The Commission found that cuts in federal support for legal assistance to the poor had greatly exacerbated the access problem and one of the commission's recommendations was to amend the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar making pro bono legal assistance to the poor mand
Access to the Legal System,
to assess and make recommendations
on the problem of lack of adequate
access to the legal system by the poor and middle class The Commission found that cuts in federal support for legal assistance to the poor had greatly exacerbated the access problem and one of the commission's recommendations was to amend the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar making pro bono legal assistance to the poor mand
access to the legal system by the poor and middle class The Commission found that
cuts in federal support for legal assistance
to the poor had greatly exacerbated the
access problem and one of the commission's recommendations was to amend the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar making pro bono legal assistance to the poor mand
access problem and one of the commission's recommendations was
to amend the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar making pro bono legal assistance
to the poor mandatory.
What really sets the CAT apart from most other Canadian courts and tribunals is the fact that it has no hearing rooms, no chambers, and no waiting room... It is a completely digital endeavour,
cutting down
on real - estate costs, and bringing
access to justice to condo dwellers through their computers, tablets and smartphones.
The Ministry of
Justice should review the impact of the
cuts on children's rights and consider in particular how trafficked and separated children are able
to access legal assistance.
The Ministry of
Justice has spent less than anticipated on legal aid following the cuts as a result of an overly restrictive and bureaucratic approach and poor provision of information on the availability of legal aid, with the effect that vulnerable people are unable to obtain access to j
Justice has spent less than anticipated
on legal aid following the
cuts as a result of an overly restrictive and bureaucratic approach and poor provision of information
on the availability of legal aid, with the effect that vulnerable people are unable
to obtain
access to justicejustice.
The TUC recommended that the government should ensure that
access to legal aid is based
on need and should carry out immediate and in - depth assessments of the impacts of budget
cuts, LASPO and reforms
to court services
on access to justice.
In its report,
Cuts That Hurt, Amnesty called
on the government
to immediately review the impact of reforms introduced by LASPO
on access to justice and the protection of human rights, particularly for vulnerable and disadvantaged groups.
Dramatic civil legal aid
cuts in the UK in 2012 and corresponding effects
to the
justice system has put
access to justice on the radar of future voters.
Legal aid lawyers maintain that the desire
to cut costs, reinforced by austerity in the last eight years, has had a serious effect
on access to justice — and thereby the rule of law.
Instead of there being a drive
to cut costs at the expense of
access to justice, the government would be better
to focus
on streamlining the systems in place
to generate efficiencies, without hindering people's ability
to bring valid claims.
It comes back
to the old argument about who pays for
access to justice; with yet further
cuts to legal aid piggy backing
on restricting
access for claimants under the Jackson reforms where's the balance
to be achieved?
Yet, massive
cuts to legal aid for family law in B.C. have had a dramatic, negative and disproportionate effect
on women's ability
to access justice.