Not exact matches
Of course, it is true that population growth of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in
public services represents a political choice by the current Conservative government, which has opted to
spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax
cuts for businesses and reducing the deficit
rather than expanding healthcare and education provision.
«I think we should also have been looking far more at progressive taxation
rather than the kinds of
cuts we're talking about here to
public spending.
[6] Correspondingly, classical liberals tended to favour
cutting taxes for the poorest in order to increase opportunity, contrasting with social liberals, who would
rather see higher
spending on
public services and the disadvantaged in order to reduce income inequality.
In 2001 when a shadow Treasury minister he had to go into hiding during that year's election campaign after claiming the Tories wanted to
cut public spending by # 20 billion
rather than the # 8 billion they had publicly stated.
In a BBC interview, Mr Osborne pledged to reduce Britain's borrowing by
cutting public spending —
rather than increasing taxes.
His claim that unemployment will fall
rather than rise in the course of this Parliament is based on the OBR assessment, rapidly rushed out to give ammunition to contest the anticipated Harman attack (incidentally providing the first suspicions about the OBR's objectivity), that whilst 600,000
public sector jobs will be lost by 2015 - 6 and a similar figure (though unspecified) in the private sector as a result of the
public spending cuts, some 2.5 m jobs will be created over the same period in the private sector.
It seems
rather incongruous that he should
spend half of his time on seemingly narrow tasks like trying to get local councils to
cut out waste and be more efficient at providing
public services, and the other half of his time on «Communities» - ie religion.
Clegg tried to show a bit of Thatcherite ankle before his spring conference last weekend, praising the Great She - Elephant's victory over the trade unions as «immensely significant» and saying that the
public finances should be repaired by
spending cuts rather than tax rises.
Ed Miliband has suggested the party would put a larger emphasis on greater taxation
rather than
public spending cuts.
Mr Osborne has given an interview to the FT (of which there is more inside the paper here) in which he asserts that Labour's projected 1.1 % annual increase in
public spending between 2011 and 2014 is «unsustainable» and that it will be
spending cuts rather than tax rises which account for reducing the the fiscal deficit:
So we will be
cutting back, not to close the # 175bn
public - finance black - hole, but to
spend the money on Tory winners
rather than Labour winners.
The first reason is that, almost three years after Gordon Brown left Downing Street, more people still blame Labour
rather than the Conservatives for the state of the economy and the
public spending cuts that Osborne has imposed.
Voters showed a preference for
public spending cuts rather than tax rises.
I cited yesterday on this site some of the big
spending decisions that government will have to make sooner
rather than later if it wants seriously to
cut the rate of
public spending.
Criticising the government's decision to tackle the deficit through
cutting back on
public spending, Mr Barber's alternative Plan B would tax higher earners more
rather than targeting «the poorest and most vulnerable,» which, he argues, is what the current
public sector
cuts are doing.