The ADR combined
cycle fuel economy number is listed at a lean 5.4 L / 100 km with CO2 emissions of 143g / km.
At the pump this amounts to a combined
cycle fuel economy number of 5.3 L / 100 km on a diet of 95 - 98 RON premium unleaded, while against the stop watch it's a 8.5 sec dash to 100km / h.
Not exact matches
Looking at the
numbers; Saving 10 - percent on
fuel for a vehicle that gets only 8 mpg over a yearly driving
cycle of 40,000 miles is almost eight times more valuable than increasing the
fuel economy of a vehicle getting 30 mpg that is driven only 20,000 miles per year.
Top speed increases seven to 205 mph for the S, yet
fuel economy improves 6 percent in the European
cycle (EPA
numbers are pending), thanks to efficiencies in the transmission and the new
fuel injection.
Mercedes claims combined
cycle fuel economy of 34.1 mpg on the European test
cycle, which typically delivers higher
numbers than the U.S. test.
It delivers 62 mpg combined city / highway
fuel economy with a 105 - hp, 1.6 - liter four - cylinder diesel engine - although the European test
cycle produces higher
fuel -
economy numbers than the U.S. test.
Fuel economy on the Japanese test cycle is 19.0 km / L (44.7 mpg US, 5.3 L / 100 km), which is comparable to a very fuel efficient compact car (remember that the Japanese test - cycle results in higher MPG numbers than the EPA methodology, so real - world results probably won't be in the mid-4
Fuel economy on the Japanese test
cycle is 19.0 km / L (44.7 mpg US, 5.3 L / 100 km), which is comparable to a very
fuel efficient compact car (remember that the Japanese test - cycle results in higher MPG numbers than the EPA methodology, so real - world results probably won't be in the mid-4
fuel efficient compact car (remember that the Japanese test -
cycle results in higher MPG
numbers than the EPA methodology, so real - world results probably won't be in the mid-40s).