Sentences with phrase «cycle model explained»

For example, when the CEI (blue dotted line) is adjusted for growth in population (red dotted line) or the labor force (black dotted line), the stock market's failure to sustainably break out above its Apr 26 high in the S&P 500 index (SPX) at 1220 is understandable, as it has been predictable by our business cycle model explained our email to you four days ago (copied in below).

Not exact matches

Unless the model captures the forces explaining the underlying cycle pretty accurately, there seems a fair bit of room for slippage between cup and lip, in the estimation process.

Elliott Main, M.D. who is the medical director of the CMQCC and the presenter of the study at the SMFM annual meeting, explained, «The keys for success were (1) multi-partner engagement, (2) rapid cycle data and (3) use of a novel quality improvement model involving pairing physician and nurse mentors working with five to eight hospitals at a time, all within the construct of a large statewide project.»

A mathematician by training, and now a Linus Pauling postdoctoral fellow in the Microbiology Group, Todd - Brown designs computer models of soil carbon cycling - or «how dirt breathes,» she explained in a #WomenInSTEM YouTube feature.

The changes Spencer saw in his model are explained by El Niño / La Niña cycles, Dessler said, not caused by clouds.

The cycle (illustrated in Figure 1.6, p. 22) begins during the lesson's introduction as the teacher models and explains the learning target and continues as the teacher provides guided practice.

The Toyota exec explained that the last three generations of the Prius have averaged a six - year life cycle and the current model was introduced in 2009, suggesting that the fourth generation is coming in 2015.

The Economist features a simple symmetric model to try to explain cycles in the financial markets.

D.P. O'Brien and R. G. Currie, «Observations of the 18.6 - year cycle of air pressure and a theoretical model to explain certain aspects of this signal», Climate Dynamics Volume 8, Number 6, 287 - 298 (1993)

To Stefan: The ability to construct simple non-chaotic phenomenological models that «explain» D - O events or Milankovich cycle doesn't prove that the events are not chaotic in their nature.

By comparing modelled and observed changes in such indices, which include the global mean surface temperature, the land - ocean temperature contrast, the temperature contrast between the NH and SH, the mean magnitude of the annual cycle in temperature over land and the mean meridional temperature gradient in the NH mid-latitudes, Braganza et al. (2004) estimate that anthropogenic forcing accounts for almost all of the warming observed between 1946 and 1995 whereas warming between 1896 and 1945 is explained by a combination of anthropogenic and natural forcing and internal variability.

We introduce a carbon cycle model that would explain the PETM by global warming following a bolide impact, leading to the oxidation of terrestrial organic carbon stores built up during the late Paleocene.

Looking at past models, however, the Milankovich Cycles can not explain this sudden warming.

That is why the early 20th century warming cycle (~ 1910 to ~ 1940), which is statistically indistinguishable from the late 20th century warming cycle (~ 1970 to ~ 2000) is difficult for the climate models to explain.

The SSM (standard solar model) does not explain solar flares, sunspots, coronal mass ejections, solar cycles or changes in Earth's climate that arise from these solar events.

The scientists explain that the known natural cycles and processes are accounted for in climate models.

His response just now is still selective e.g. a claim the rise will be only 1.2 C without explaining why it should stop there or accounting for feedback cycles and thermal inertia or the fact that all models have us on course for 3 C or more by 2100.

our models for instance don't seem to even attempt to explain and illustrate by recreating many of the natural flucuations of the last say, 9000 years — they lack understanding of many of the known cyclics and how they and the less - understood undiscovered cycles effect and interact.)

Now forced to explain the warming hiatus, Trenberth has flipped flopped about the PDO's importance writing «One of the things emerging from several lines is that the IPCC has not paid enough attention to natural variability, on several time scales,» «especially El Niños and La Niñas, the Pacific Ocean phenomena that are not yet captured by climate models, and the longer term Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) which have cycle lengths of about 60 years.»

There you go again with our models can't explain paleo - climate changes (glacial cycles) unless we interject a 2xCO2 climate sensitivity of 3C.

It doesn't happen in a linear, reasoned way — we don't have time to stop and think about attachment, interaction cycles or internal working models — and perhaps not in a way we fully understand or can explain why or how, but in a powerful way nonetheless.